On 21.04.2016 01:51, Seb wrote:
It would be great if we had a better, painless way to handle the
changelog - two simple ideas:
1) Use a changelog folder instead of file
After having rebased a pull request for the third time just because of
changelog.dd: Sounds good to me.
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 03:09:43 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 23:51:41 UTC, Seb wrote:
Honestly I prefer 1) - the changelog entry can be approved &
checked during the code review on Github and the reviewers can
check that such an addition is provided in
On 4/20/16 11:09 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 23:51:41 UTC, Seb wrote:
Honestly I prefer 1) - the changelog entry can be approved & checked
during the code review on Github and the reviewers can check that such
an addition is provided in the PR. On a new release
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 23:51:41 UTC, Seb wrote:
Honestly I prefer 1) - the changelog entry can be approved &
checked during the code review on Github and the reviewers can
check that such an addition is provided in the PR. On a new
release we can just cat the files and remove them -
