On Saturday, 2 May 2015 at 18:02:34 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 21:42:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 17:51:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/30/2015 5:55 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I think Freddy's programs are working as designed.
Yes, they are.
D
On Saturday, 2 May 2015 at 03:35:17 UTC, ketmar wrote:
if js doing something, big chances are that it's wrong. Brendan
failed
his Scheme classes, especially those where he was taught about
closures.
Here's another fun thing about javascript:
a = new Number(1);
b = new Number(1);
a=b; // true
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 21:42:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 17:51:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/30/2015 5:55 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I think Freddy's programs are working as designed.
Yes, they are.
D closures capture variables by reference. No, we're not
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 21:46:15 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
No it does not. In JS, var declare a variable at function
level, so that is why you see the behavior you see.
Yes, I know, I said that a short while down in that post.
On Fri, 01 May 2015 18:08:07 +, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Javascript does D's current behavior, so I thought it was correct too,
if js doing something, big chances are that it's wrong. Brendan failed
his Scheme classes, especially those where he was taught about closures.
signature.asc
On Saturday, 2 May 2015 at 00:55:19 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 21:46:15 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
No it does not. In JS, var declare a variable at function
level, so that is why you see the behavior you see.
Yes, I know, I said that a short while down in that post.
Saw
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 17:51:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes, they are.
I thought this until just a couple weeks ago when I was shown to
be pretty conclusively wrong. See the discussion here:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2043
When a new scope is introduced, a new variable is
On 5/1/2015 11:08 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
There, I say it is expected because a longstanding bug is expected to work
around but that doesn't make it *right*.
I did agree in the bug report on that that it was a bug.
On 4/30/2015 5:55 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I think Freddy's programs are working as designed.
Yes, they are.
D closures capture variables by reference. No, we're not changing that.
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 17:51:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/30/2015 5:55 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I think Freddy's programs are working as designed.
Yes, they are.
D closures capture variables by reference. No, we're not
changing that.
The variable is declared in the block,
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 18:08:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Javascript does D's current behavior, so I thought it was
correct too, but C# doesn't it that way.
No it does not. In JS, var declare a variable at function level,
so that is why you see the behavior you see.
Since JS 1.7, you can
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 12:55:18 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 12:01:32 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 05:23:55 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 03:58:44 UTC, Freddy wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 12:01:32 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 05:23:55 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 03:58:44 UTC, Freddy wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 01:19:45 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
Because copy is still modified
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 05:23:55 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 03:58:44 UTC, Freddy wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 01:19:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Because copy is still modified every time i is.
But shouldn't copy be redeclared every loop
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:55:16 +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
D closures should work in the same way as, e.g., JS closures.
js closures are fubared.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 04/30/2015 05:55 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
D closures should work in the same way as, e.g., JS closures. Try
rewriting the program in JavaScript. If it behaves in the same way, it's
not a D bug.
Right.
I remember Seth Ladd's Dart language presentation at the local ACCU in
Silicon
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 01:16:20 UTC, Freddy wrote:
I understand that
import std.stdio;
void main(){
int delegate() func;
foreach(i;0..10){
if(i==5){
func= () = i;
}
}
writeln(func());//9
}
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 03:58:44 UTC, Freddy wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 01:19:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Because copy is still modified every time i is.
But shouldn't copy be redeclared every loop iteration (or the
compiler could pretend to redeclare it).
No, it will
On Thursday, 30 April 2015 at 01:19:45 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Because copy is still modified every time i is.
But shouldn't copy be redeclared every loop iteration (or the
compiler could pretend to redeclare it).
19 matches
Mail list logo
