Am 01.08.2012 17:40, schrieb monarch_dodra:
I know of the "deprecate" keyword, but I was wondering: Is there a
"scheduledDeprecated" keyword?
While I know you can still force-compile with deprecated feature, that
isn't exactly the same thing.
I'm talking about stuff that is NOT YET deprecated,
On Wednesday, August 01, 2012 17:40:41 monarch_dodra wrote:
> I know of the "deprecate" keyword, but I was wondering: Is there
> a "scheduledDeprecated" keyword?
>
> While I know you can still force-compile with deprecated feature,
> that isn't exactly the same thing.
>
> I'm talking about stuff
I know of the "deprecate" keyword, but I was wondering: Is there
a "scheduledDeprecated" keyword?
While I know you can still force-compile with deprecated feature,
that isn't exactly the same thing.
I'm talking about stuff that is NOT YET deprecated, but soon will
be. I want to know about th
Tomasz Sowiński wrote:
This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the deprecation
date would result in a *warning*.
Compiling the deprecated declaration OR any reference to it *after* the date
wou
Georg Wrede Wrote:
> Yes. It's a matter of principle, that a compiler should behave the same,
> no matter what the wall clock says. (Commercial beta versions excluded,
> which totally stop working at a fixed date, but that's different.)
>
> What could be useful is a switch --show-deprecated tha
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> ; "ski" wrote
> in message news:gtv3u0$2q0...@digitalmars.com...
> > This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
> >
> > deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
> >
> > Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the
> > deprecation date would result in a *w
On Thu, 07 May 2009 12:57:36 -0400, Tomasz Sowiński wrote:
> This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
>
> deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
>
> Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the
> deprecation date would result in a *warning*. Compiling the deprecated
> declarat
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
; "ski" wrote
in message news:gtv3u0$2q0...@digitalmars.com...
This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the
deprecation date would result in a *warning*.
Compiling the de
; "ski" wrote
in message news:gtv3u0$2q0...@digitalmars.com...
> This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
>
> deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
>
> Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the
> deprecation date would result in a *warning*.
> Compiling the deprecated decl
On Thu, 07 May 2009 20:57:36 +0400, Tomasz wrote:
> This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
>
> deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
>
> Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the
> deprecation date would result in a *warning*.
> Compiling the deprecated declaration OR a
This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the deprecation
date would result in a *warning*.
Compiling the deprecated declaration OR any reference to it *after* the date
would result in an *error*.
11 matches
Mail list logo