Jonathan M Davis:
> The situation in D with regards to variable names isn't really any more
> complex in D than it is in C++,
I don't agree. In D I use many inner functions, so I have to be careful about
where a variable is defined, if global, if local, or if local in the outer
function. This
On 2011-06-25 05:52, bearophile wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis:
> >That's why a lot of people typically use a different naming scheme for
> >member variables (e.g. prepending them with _ or m_). As long as you're
> >smart about naming, it's really not a problem.<
>
> I too use the leading underscore. T
Peter Alexander:
> This is a solved problem. No need for throwing more and more language
> features at it.
I agree, from what I am seeing in Haskell it's a mostly solved problem.
Bye,
bearophile
Jonathan M Davis:
>That's why a lot of people typically use a different naming scheme for member
>variables (e.g. prepending them with _ or m_). As long as you're smart about
>naming, it's really not a problem.<
I too use the leading underscore. The problem with using name tags like the
leadin
On 25/06/11 2:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That's why a lot of people typically use a different naming scheme for member
variables (e.g. prepending them with _ or m_). As long as you're smart about
naming, it's really not a problem.
I don't want that to be required though.
Yeah. That would
On 2011-06-24 17:39, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> >void baz(local int k) {
> >
> >void inner(local int k) {}
> >
> >}
>
> This is unneeded. By declaring a local variable, it's
> *obviously* local - there's no point in saying local again!
>
> Now, I've forgotten that I had a vari
Adam D. Ruppe:
> >void baz(local int k) {
> >void inner(local int k) {}
> >}
>
> This is unneeded. By declaring a local variable, it's
> *obviously* local - there's no point in saying local again!
> If D was a bad language that allowed implicit variable definitions,
> it might ma
>void baz(local int k) {
>void inner(local int k) {}
>}
This is unneeded. By declaring a local variable, it's
*obviously* local - there's no point in saying local again!
Now, I've forgotten that I had a variable declared before, but
adding more stuff to the argument list wouldn't
This post is a follow-up of something I've written almost one year ago, that I
have summarized here:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5007
Feel free to ignore this post if you are busy, or if you didn't appreciate the
precedent post.
In my C/D programs some common troubles (or eve
