On 2012-04-30 20:21, Adam Wilson wrote:
I agree, however, DMD has not yet performed it's semantic analysis at
the time of DI generation so I have no clue what the type is when the
files are generated. Theoretically that could be changed but such a
decision is WAY above my paygrade and would prob
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:21:10 -0700, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-04-29 05:03, Adam Wilson wrote:
Ok, I can accept that. Explicit typing is lots of extra pointless typing
when the compiler can just figure it out for me. But that leaves us with
an interesting design question. Right now, DI gen
On Sunday, 29 April 2012 at 15:21:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
No, I think it's way better that the DI generator outputs the
actually type instead of just "shared/auto" and the assignment.
In this case:
shared stdin = &_iob[0];
Should be generated as:
shared File stdin;
Anything to the rig
On 2012-04-29 05:03, Adam Wilson wrote:
Ok, I can accept that. Explicit typing is lots of extra pointless typing
when the compiler can just figure it out for me. But that leaves us with
an interesting design question. Right now, DI gen is destructive, which
means any changes I make to the DI fil
Am 29.04.2012 05:03, schrieb Adam Wilson:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:23:28 -0700, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 18:32:00 Adam Wilson wrote:
Ok, so that answers the legality of the issue, but it smacks of sloppy
coding. We cannot ship the DRT as a dynamic library, as has been
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:23:28 -0700, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 18:32:00 Adam Wilson wrote:
Ok, so that answers the legality of the issue, but it smacks of sloppy
coding. We cannot ship the DRT as a dynamic library, as has been
discussed
and agreed to as a good idea
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 18:32:00 Adam Wilson wrote:
> Ok, so that answers the legality of the issue, but it smacks of sloppy
> coding. We cannot ship the DRT as a dynamic library, as has been discussed
> and agreed to as a good idea, if their are variable declarations that rely
> on type infere
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:23:30 -0700, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/28/2012 06:08 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Ok. So i've been trying to build Phobos with my new DI generation code
(available here: https://github.com/LightBender/dmd.git) and i've run
into an interesting usage of shared in the D Runtime. N
On 04/28/2012 06:08 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Ok. So i've been trying to build Phobos with my new DI generation code
(available here: https://github.com/LightBender/dmd.git) and i've run
into an interesting usage of shared in the D Runtime. Namely, it has no
type. I've been told that this is not cor
Ok. So i've been trying to build Phobos with my new DI generation code
(available here: https://github.com/LightBender/dmd.git) and i've run into
an interesting usage of shared in the D Runtime. Namely, it has no type.
I've been told that this is not correct and it should have a type. Is that
10 matches
Mail list logo
