"5. The kind that a tool such as 'dfix', can automate. For example, let's say dfix is included with the compiler package. Now you get an error, saying: "Error: `@nogc` is no longer accepted, but can be automatically replaced with `nogc`. Run dfix on this file? (y/n)"... or whatever is deemed the secure approach to this feature. "
Sorry for the tangent (I have no view on the major topic), +1 for including a link to dfix within the compiler. Repetitive things ought to be automated and made easy and how many times does one end up fixing up old code ?
