On Sunday, August 11, 2013 11:16:44 Walter Bright wrote:
> Your post here also broke the thread. Your post appears in reply to the
> initial post of the thread, rather than the post you actually replied to.
Maybe due to that issue with mailman rewriting IDs? If not, I have no idea
why. The proble
On 8/10/2013 6:37 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
If you never noticed it, I'd guess that you use gmail's web interface rather
than a local client, as gmail will show your sent messages in the threading
that it does. If you're using a local client, that obviously doesn't happen,
since sent messages d
On 11 August 2013 02:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Sunday, August 11, 2013 02:25:33 Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 11 August 2013 00:16, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> > On Saturday, August 10, 2013 17:31:39 Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> >> On 10 August 2013 16:52, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> >> > On 08/10/2013 08:4
On Sunday, August 11, 2013 02:25:33 Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 11 August 2013 00:16, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 10, 2013 17:31:39 Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >> On 10 August 2013 16:52, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> >> > On 08/10/2013 08:42 AM, artur wrote:
> >> >> Apparently, posts from the ma
On 11 August 2013 00:16, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday, August 10, 2013 17:31:39 Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 10 August 2013 16:52, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> > On 08/10/2013 08:42 AM, artur wrote:
>> >> Apparently, posts from the mailing lists are not making it to the
>> >> web i/f; the other dir
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 17:31:39 Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 10 August 2013 16:52, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> > On 08/10/2013 08:42 AM, artur wrote:
> >> Apparently, posts from the mailing lists are not making it to the
> >> web i/f; the other direction seems to work.
> >
> > It looks to be the revers
On 10 August 2013 18:12, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:42:50 +0200
> schrieb "artur" :
>
>> On Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 15:21:42 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> > Just had someone respond to a thread in D.gnu complaining that
>> > there had been no response for 15 days. And if you l
On 10 August 2013 21:11, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 09:31 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> looks like Ali won't receive this message, and I
>> don't expect this message to show on the forum interface either...
>
> Luckily, you are wrong. :) Both Thunderbird and the web interface received
> both
On 10 August 2013 21:11, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 09:31 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> looks like Ali won't receive this message, and I
>> don't expect this message to show on the forum interface either...
>
> Luckily, you are wrong. :) Both Thunderbird and the web interface received
> both
On 08/10/2013 09:31 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> looks like Ali won't receive this message, and I
> don't expect this message to show on the forum interface either...
Luckily, you are wrong. :) Both Thunderbird and the web interface
received both your and Artur Skawina's messages.
I think the pro
May be it can even retain messages for itself - for exclusive use
by mailing list subscribers.
Did you try to search for the missing post?
mailman screws thread structure and message may end up in another
thread.
Am Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:42:50 +0200
schrieb "artur" :
> On Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 15:21:42 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > Just had someone respond to a thread in D.gnu complaining that
> > there had been no response for 15 days. And if you look at the
> > thread from forum.dlang.org, it would
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 05:31:39PM +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 10 August 2013 16:52, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> > On 08/10/2013 08:42 AM, artur wrote:
> >
> >> Apparently, posts from the mailing lists are not making it to the
> >> web i/f; the other direction seems to work.
> >
> > It looks to be the
On 10 August 2013 16:52, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 08:42 AM, artur wrote:
>
>> Apparently, posts from the mailing lists are not making it to the
>> web i/f; the other direction seems to work.
>
> It looks to be the reverse for that sample thread: My response to Iain was
> posted from Thun
On 08/10/13 17:52, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 08:42 AM, artur wrote:
>
>> Apparently, posts from the mailing lists are not making it to the
>> web i/f; the other direction seems to work.
>
> It looks to be the reverse for that sample thread: My response to Iain was
> posted from Thunderb
On 08/10/2013 08:42 AM, artur wrote:
> Apparently, posts from the mailing lists are not making it to the
> web i/f; the other direction seems to work.
It looks to be the reverse for that sample thread: My response to Iain
was posted from Thunderbird. (I don't use the forum interface.)
Ali
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:40:45 -0700
Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 08:21 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> > http://forum.dlang.org/post/ku3odb$bpe$1...@digitalmars.com
> >
> > At a first glance, it looks like there's only two posts in that
> > thread, but looking in my inbox, there's actually s
On Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 15:21:42 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Just had someone respond to a thread in D.gnu complaining that
there had been no response for 15 days. And if you look at the
thread from forum.dlang.org, it would appear to be the case,
however there were a few other responses th
On 08/10/2013 08:21 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/ku3odb$bpe$1...@digitalmars.com
>
> At a first glance, it looks like there's only two posts in that thread,
> but looking in my inbox, there's actually seven...
For that thread, my Thunderbird inbox matches http://forum.dla
Just had someone respond to a thread in D.gnu complaining that
there had been no response for 15 days. And if you look at the
thread from forum.dlang.org, it would appear to be the case,
however there were a few other responses that seem to have been
lost.
Here's another example:
http://for
21 matches
Mail list logo
