language_fan:
> Since your suggestion may add new syntactic constructs, can you somehow
> show that making the language more strict also improves overall program
> quality in some ways that unit testing and stronger type system cannot
> achieve.
In that example I've shown the possible syntax o
Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:17:22 -0400, bearophile thusly wrote:
> There are other ways to make the language more strict, for example
> disallowing some automatic casts, etc. (C# already has some of this, for
> example float => double requires a cast. I don't remember if D2 requires
> this already).
Sin
In some dynamic/scripting languages the basic programming modality is quite
relaxed, this may help the programmer to quickly write a 10 lines long script.
But when they want to write longer programs of 200 or 2000+ lines, some of such
languages offer a "strict mode" that im
