On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 11:27:18 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
http://schedule.gdceurope.com/session/d-using-an-emerging-language-in-quantum-break
My proposal for a talk has been accepted, and I'll be in
Cologne next month presenting to industry peers.
One of the things I was asking during the
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 11:27:18 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
http://schedule.gdceurope.com/session/d-using-an-emerging-language-in-quantum-break
My proposal for a talk has been accepted, and I'll be in
Cologne next month presenting to industry peers.
Speaking of the binding system,
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 11:27:18 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
http://schedule.gdceurope.com/session/d-using-an-emerging-language-in-quantum-break
My proposal for a talk has been accepted, and I'll be in
Cologne next month presenting to industry peers.
Awesome ! I hope you can make good impr
On 2016-07-12 13:27, Ethan Watson wrote:
http://schedule.gdceurope.com/session/d-using-an-emerging-language-in-quantum-break
My proposal for a talk has been accepted, and I'll be in Cologne next
month presenting to industry peers.
Will the talk be recorded?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 17:55:22 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
However, this goes to prove my point. In both cases, it's a
bunch of legwork just to get to a true_type or a false_type.
Ok, I don't have much trouble with it. I usually want to abstract
such tests into concepts and stuff them in to
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 16:24:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
you'll get the same response that you would get from D-users if
you compared C++17 to D1...
That's both wildly hyperbolic; and not going to happen for the
mentioned reasons.
I can get this to work:
Which is both not the
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 16:24:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
template
struct has_equality() == std::declval()
)>> : std::true_type { };
It looks horrible.
And in D it is much prettier.
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 15:50:59 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
that aren't necessarily up to date. What I'd rather do is have
further examples visible online for C++17 standards to compare
against. Either way, given Microsoft's rate, the industry will
be able to use C++17 some time in 2021.
We
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 14:48:17 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
«
template struct make_void { typedef void type;};
template using void_t = typename
make_void::type;
»
Variadic expansion works on my home code in VS2015. But we
shipped Quantum Break on VS2012. I can use variadic template
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 14:29:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
This is awesome! You should do an interview with Mike about the
conference. -- Andrei
Just saw an email from him to this effect.
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 14:48:17 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 12:57:15 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 12:51:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
C++14/17 stuff
Which would be relevant if the target audience didn't need to
support Visual
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 12:57:15 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 12:51:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
C++14/17 stuff
Which would be relevant if the target audience didn't need to
support Visual Studio, which still doesn't fully support C++11
in the latest revisio
On 07/12/2016 07:27 AM, Ethan Watson wrote:
http://schedule.gdceurope.com/session/d-using-an-emerging-language-in-quantum-break
My proposal for a talk has been accepted, and I'll be in Cologne next
month presenting to industry peers.
This is awesome! You should do an interview with Mike about
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 13:34:42 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 11:27:18 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
http://schedule.gdceurope.com/session/d-using-an-emerging-language-in-quantum-break
My proposal for a talk has been accepted, and I'll be in
Cologne next month presenting to
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 11:27:18 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
http://schedule.gdceurope.com/session/d-using-an-emerging-language-in-quantum-break
My proposal for a talk has been accepted, and I'll be in
Cologne next month presenting to industry peers.
Congratulations and it sounds good, how
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 12:51:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
C++14/17 stuff
Which would be relevant if the target audience didn't need to
support Visual Studio, which still doesn't fully support C++11 in
the latest revision let alone C++14 features.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 11:27:18 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
* Check a type for an equality operator
- C++ - SFINAE whackiness, and as near as I can tell requires
separate tests to determine if an object has a member operator
and/or a global operator for comparison tests
It isn't all that
http://schedule.gdceurope.com/session/d-using-an-emerging-language-in-quantum-break
My proposal for a talk has been accepted, and I'll be in Cologne
next month presenting to industry peers.
One of the things I was asking during the approval process was
whether attendees tended to be more on t
18 matches
Mail list logo
