On 05/03/2011 12:11, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Is this behaviour correct? Should it even be legal to blindly allow access to
members/fields via the .outer context pointer (that may not even be there as
shown in this instance)?
class Outer
{
int w = 3;
void method()
{
int x = 4;
On 05/03/2011 12:11, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Is this behaviour correct? Should it even be legal to blindly allow access to
members/fields via the .outer context pointer (that may not even be there as
shown in this instance)?
snip
Bug filed:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5711
Is this behaviour correct? Should it even be legal to blindly allow access to
members/fields via the .outer context pointer (that may not even be there as
shown in this instance)?
class Outer
{
int w = 3;
void method()
{
int x = 4;
new class Object
{
