On 03/18/12 12:34, Derek wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:00:06 +1100, Derek ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
The 'adding' is not the point; it could be any functionality. The point I
was trying to get across was that it would be useful if the compiler could
infer the type parameters of a
A template is a parameterized namespace. That is, it is a namespace (a name
through which other objects can be accessed) that may be passed parameters that
can modify the nature of the stuff inside.
If a template is a compile-time function, then the equivalent of a function
call - the
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:01:00 +1100, FeepingCreature
default_357-l...@yahoo.de wrote:
There's a shortcut for this, called IFTI, implicit function template
instantiation ...
What would be useful is ...
template bar(T...){ void bar(T t) { writefln(t); } }
int a,b,c;
bar!(a, b, c); //
On 3/18/12, Derek ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
What would be useful is ...
bar!(a, b, c); // is equivalent to
bar!(int, int, int).bar(a, b, c);
You mean like this?
template bar(T...)
{
void bar() { writeln(T); }
}
void main()
{
int a = 1, b = 2, c = 3;
bar!(a, b, c);
}
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.851.1332059038.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 3/18/12, Derek ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
What would be useful is ...
bar!(a, b, c); // is equivalent to
bar!(int, int, int).bar(a, b, c);
You mean like this?
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:16:02 +1100, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/18/12, Derek ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
What would be useful is ...
bar!(a, b, c); // is equivalent to
bar!(int, int, int).bar(a, b, c);
You mean like this?
template bar(T...)
{
void bar()
On 03/18/12 11:29, Derek wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:16:02 +1100, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/18/12, Derek ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
What would be useful is ...
bar!(a, b, c); // is equivalent to
bar!(int, int, int).bar(a, b, c);
You mean like this?
On 03/18/12 11:36, FeepingCreature wrote:
On 03/18/12 11:29, Derek wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:16:02 +1100, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/18/12, Derek ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
What would be useful is ...
bar!(a, b, c); // is equivalent to
bar!(int, int,
On 03/18/12 11:39, FeepingCreature wrote:
On 03/18/12 11:36, FeepingCreature wrote:
On 03/18/12 11:29, Derek wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:16:02 +1100, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/18/12, Derek ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
What would be useful is ...
bar!(a, b,
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:40:10 +1100, FeepingCreature
default_357-l...@yahoo.de wrote:
On 03/18/12 11:39, FeepingCreature wrote:
On 03/18/12 11:36, FeepingCreature wrote:
On 03/18/12 11:29, Derek wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:16:02 +1100, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:36:46 +1100, FeepingCreature
default_357-l...@yahoo.de wrote:
why would you do that
To make coding easier to write AND read.
what do you want to _do_
Infer template arguments from the data types presented in the data values
supplied on the instantiation
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:00:06 +1100, Derek ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
The 'adding' is not the point; it could be any functionality. The point
I was trying to get across was that it would be useful if the compiler
could infer the type parameters of a template instantiation from the
types
On 18.03.2012 15:34, Derek wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:00:06 +1100, Derek ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
The 'adding' is not the point; it could be any functionality. The
point I was trying to get across was that it would be useful if the
compiler could infer the type parameters of a template
On 03/18/12 12:05, Derek wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:36:46 +1100, FeepingCreature
default_357-l...@yahoo.de wrote:
why would you do that
To make coding easier to write AND read.
what do you want to _do_
Infer template arguments from the data types presented in the data values
14 matches
Mail list logo
