On 10/14/2014 3:38 AM, Don wrote:
and then Walter confessed to having done it.
I was threatened with the Comfy Chair. What else could I do?
On 10/14/14 11:34 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 18:50:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/13/2014 1:53 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
https://www.reddit.com/r/
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 18:50:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/13/2014 1:53 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2j3kr4/proposal_for_unif
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 06:29:01 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 14/10/14 03:55, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The concept is in D1 for arrays since as long as I've ever
used D.
As far as I recall, it was an accidental feature of arrays and
perhaps associative arrays. Might be a bit hard
On 14/10/14 03:55, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The concept is in D1 for arrays since as long as I've ever used D.
As far as I recall, it was an accidental feature of arrays and perhaps
associative arrays. Might be a bit hard to track down that.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 10/13/2014 6:55 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 10/13/14 2:50 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/13/2014 1:53 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comm
On 10/13/14 2:50 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/13/2014 1:53 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2j3kr4/proposal_for_unified_call_syntax_for_c_x
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 17:29:56 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 13.10.2014 um 10:53 schrieb Peter Alexander:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
Just noticed that Herb Sutter also presented one,
http://isocpp.org/f
:-)Ali, you made my day!
Actually, there are references to D in that article. One of those is
even about considering D as an "alternative". An excerpt from page 10:
void alternative(D& d)// an alternative to consider
{
// ...
}
On 10/13/2014 01:53 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
Actually, there are references to D in that article. One of those is
even about considering D as an "alternative". An excerpt from pag
On 10/13/2014 1:53 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2j3kr4/proposal_for_unified_call_syntax_for_c_xfy_vs_fxy/
and:
https://www.reddit.com/r/
Am 13.10.2014 um 10:53 schrieb Peter Alexander:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
Just noticed that Herb Sutter also presented one,
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4165.pdf
--
Paulo
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 09:32:58 UTC, Francesco Cattoglio
wrote:
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 08:53:28 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
Seriously, not even a mention? Ok, I'm mad
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:14:36 +
ponce via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> UFCS could be fun in C++ with dependence on import order and the
> best-match rule.
c++ coders love to fight with their tools. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 08:53:28 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
UFCS could be fun in C++ with dependence on import order and the
best-match rule.
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 08:53:28 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
UFCS in Pascal
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,26025.45.html
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:04:05 +
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I am starting to be afraid what C++17 or C++20 might look like.
a monster praying "kl me..." ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 08:53:28 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
After going through most of the CppCon videos during the weekend,
I am starting to be afraid what C++17 or C++20 m
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 09:32:58 UTC, Francesco Cattoglio
wrote:
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 08:53:28 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
Seriously, not even a mention? Ok, I'm mad
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 08:53:28 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
Seriously, not even a mention? Ok, I'm mad. Can I be mad?
Looks like Bjarne has proposed UFCS for C++
http://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4174.pdf
No mention of D though...
21 matches
Mail list logo
