On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:05:25PM +0200, Don wrote:
> On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 20:46:35 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:47:46PM +0200, Peter Alexander wrote:
[...]
> >>Maybe the compiler could just spew out every possible error for
> >>every instantiation, and expect the user
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:05:25PM +0200, Don wrote:
> On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 20:46:35 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:47:46PM +0200, Peter Alexander wrote:
[...]
> >>Maybe the compiler could just spew out every possible error for
> >>every instantiation, and expect the user
On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 20:46:35 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:47:46PM +0200, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 18:10:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 02:06:46PM +0200, Peter Alexander
>wrote:
>>It's a tough situation and I think the only w
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:47:46PM +0200, Peter Alexander wrote:
> On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 18:10:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 02:06:46PM +0200, Peter Alexander wrote:
> >>It's a tough situation and I think the only way this could even
> >>reasonably be resolved is through
On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 18:10:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 02:06:46PM +0200, Peter Alexander wrote:
It's a tough situation and I think the only way this could even
reasonably be resolved is through some sophisticated IDE
integration. There is no way to display this kind of
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 02:06:46PM +0200, Peter Alexander wrote:
[...]
> The problem here is more general than this specific case. Any
> template constraint on any function could fail to pass, and the best
> error you'll get is that it couldn't match any function. Even if the
> error messages were
On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 06:58:29 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/
Ironically, this isn't helpful. H. S. Teoh is opening up a
discussion, not reporting a bug.
The problem here is more general than this specific case. Any
template constraint on any function could fail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/
I'm posting this here 'cos I've no idea how to improve it, but it's
definitely a problem:
First, let's define a struct that overloads opCast:
struct S {
T opCast(T)()
if (is(T == struct))
{
T t;
