Tomek Sowiński wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
>
>> Tomek S.:
>>
>>> This doesn't work:
>>> int opIndex(int[][] m, uint i, uint j) { return m[i][j]; }
>> That's cute, but in D overloaded operator can be defined inside
>> structs/classes/unions only (this is different from C++).
>
> Yeah, I know, but
bearophile wrote:
> Tomek S.:
>
>> This doesn't work:
>> int opIndex(int[][] m, uint i, uint j) { return m[i][j]; }
>
> That's cute, but in D overloaded operator can be defined inside
> structs/classes/unions only (this is different from C++).
Yeah, I know, but why? What bad would happen if ope
Tomek S.:
> This doesn't work:
> int opIndex(int[][] m, uint i, uint j) { return m[i][j]; }
That's cute, but in D overloaded operator can be defined inside
structs/classes/unions only (this is different from C++).
Bye,
bearophile
This doesn't work:
int opIndex(int[][] m, uint i, uint j) { return m[i][j]; }
unittest {
auto m = [[9,8], [2,3]];
auto a = m[0,1];
}
It's so by design or by bug?
Tomek
p.s. Where on D page is uniform call syntax documented? Couldn't find it in
functions section.
