Tim M wrote:
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:27:43 +1300, <4tuu4k...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
Hi
This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list:
http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/
Right now the wish list looks like this:
198 Stack tracing (#26)
192 Reflection API (#6)
131 ve
"Tim M" wrote in message news:op.up3qsai6jdp...@tim-laptop...
> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:58:15 +1300, Jarrett Billingsley
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Tim M wrote:
>>>
>>> Who's idea was the vectorization? Seems very usefull but not sure if
>>> really
>>> like the syntax. Would
Christopher Wright wrote:
> Daniel Keep wrote:
>> unordered foreach( i ; 0..10 )
>> {
>> ...
>> }
>
> If the foreach body consists of a pure function call, then the foreach
> is reorderable and parallelizable.
>
> Considering that, you could save a keyword and use 'pure' rather than
> 'fore
Daniel Keep wrote:
unordered foreach( i ; 0..10 )
{
...
}
If the foreach body consists of a pure function call, then the foreach
is reorderable and parallelizable.
Considering that, you could save a keyword and use 'pure' rather than
'foreach'.
If you like the idea, send Walter a patc
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:25:10 +1300, Daniel Keep
wrote:
Tim M wrote:
Through out that page it shows examples of iterations where order is not
actually defined, the index has to modify by one but it gives the
compiler the ability to create a few threads and execute in parallel.
Thats what I
Tim M wrote:
> Through out that page it shows examples of iterations where order is not
> actually defined, the index has to modify by one but it gives the
> compiler the ability to create a few threads and execute in parallel.
> Thats what I was actually talking about. I would hate for that code
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:58:15 +1300, Jarrett Billingsley
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Tim M wrote:
Who's idea was the vectorization? Seems very usefull but not sure if
really
like the syntax. Wouldn't it be simpler to have unordered attribute for
all
kinds loops that the com
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Tim M wrote:
>
> Who's idea was the vectorization? Seems very usefull but not sure if really
> like the syntax. Wouldn't it be simpler to have unordered attribute for all
> kinds loops that the compiler can use?
>
D already has some simple vectorization features:
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:27:43 +1300, <4tuu4k...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
Hi
This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list:
http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/
Right now the wish list looks like this:
198 Stack tracing (#26)
192 Reflection API (#6)
131 vectorization (#
Hi
This is the monthly status for the unofficial d wish list:
http://all-technology.com/eigenpolls/dwishlist/
Right now the wish list looks like this:
198 Stack tracing (#26)
192 Reflection API (#6)
131 vectorization (#10)
110 Multiple return values (tuples (#28)
98 Multiple opCast per cl
10 matches
Mail list logo
