On 06.09.2016 22:44, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 17:58:44 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I don't think so (although your case could be made to work easily
enough). This seems to be accepts-invalid.
What do you think of the original example [1] in the bug report that uses
`mix
On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 17:58:44 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I don't think so (although your case could be made to work
easily enough). This seems to be accepts-invalid.
What do you think of the original example [1] in the bug report
that uses
`mixin Proxy!i;` ?
[1] https://issues.dlang
On 06.09.2016 14:56, Johan Engelen wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about the validity of this code:
```
void main()
{
struct A {
int i;
}
struct S
{
union U
{
A first;
A second;
}
U u;
this(A val)
On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 12:56:24 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
The compiler allows it, but it leads to a bug with CTFE of this
code: the assert fails.
Before someone smart tries it, yes the code works with LDC, but
wait... swap the order of `first` and `second` in the union, and
BOOM!
I
Hi all,
I have a question about the validity of this code:
```
void main()
{
struct A {
int i;
}
struct S
{
union U
{
A first;
A second;
}
U u;
this(A val)
{
u.second = val;
a
