On 15-11-2011 02:15, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 11-11-2011 18:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/11/11 6:44 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 05-11-2011 21:48, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I have had a recent pull request regarding the updating of some of
GDC's OS
and Arch version identifiers.
htt
On 11-11-2011 18:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/11/11 6:44 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 05-11-2011 21:48, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I have had a recent pull request regarding the updating of some of
GDC's OS
and Arch version identifiers.
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/pull-request/2/mak
On 11/11/11 6:44 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 05-11-2011 21:48, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I have had a recent pull request regarding the updating of some of
GDC's OS
and Arch version identifiers.
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/pull-request/2/make-some-system-and-cpu-version
Such changes incl
On 05-11-2011 21:48, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I have had a recent pull request regarding the updating of some of GDC's OS
and Arch version identifiers.
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/pull-request/2/make-some-system-and-cpu-version
Such changes include, aix -> AIX; ALPHA -> Alpha; and a few more
On Monday, November 07, 2011 17:04 Walter Bright wrote:
> On 11/7/2011 2:29 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> > If any change is to be made, and I'm not sure it's a good idea to change
> > anything at all here, I'd go with all lower case for all of them.
>
> I don't see any gain to changing the existing i
On 11/7/2011 2:29 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
If any change is to be made, and I'm not sure it's a good idea to change
anything at all here, I'd go with all lower case for all of them.
I don't see any gain to changing the existing identifiers. It's all bikeshedding
with the illusion of progress, y
On 8 November 2011 00:33, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> == Quote from Manu (turkey...@gmail.com)'s article
> > --001485ec112698f20204b120c415
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> > I've been running into this problem on consoles.
> > I'd vote for creating a standard, only creating new identifiers
== Quote from Manu (turkey...@gmail.com)'s article
> --001485ec112698f20204b120c415
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> I've been running into this problem on consoles.
> I'd vote for creating a standard, only creating new identifiers according
> to that standard, and also adding standardis
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Alex R?nne Petersen wrote:
> On 07-11-2011 14:59, Alex R?nne Petersen wrote:
> > On 07-11-2011 14:20, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > > "Walter Bright" wrote in message
> > > news:j9784p$24tu$1...@digitalmars.com...
> > > >
> > > > Based on my research:
> > > >
> > > > _WIN32 Micro
On 07-11-2011 14:59, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 07-11-2011 14:20, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:j9784p$24tu$1...@digitalmars.com...
Based on my research:
_WIN32 Microsoft NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Win32s,
Windows 2000
_WIN64 Windows for AMD64
linux Linux
__
On 07-11-2011 13:29, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-11-07 11:55, Manu wrote:
True-ish, but they're not even slightly the same from a developer
perspective. People often make that mistake, where technologies are
similar, but neglect the fact that you have to do fundamentally
different things on th
On 07-11-2011 14:20, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:j9784p$24tu$1...@digitalmars.com...
Based on my research:
_WIN32 Microsoft NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Win32s,
Windows 2000
_WIN64 Windows for AMD64
linux L
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:j9784p$24tu$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Based on my research:
>
> _WIN32 Microsoft NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Win32s,
> Windows 2000
> _WIN64 Windows for AMD64
> linux Linux
> __APPLE__ Mac O
On 2011-11-07 11:55, Manu wrote:
True-ish, but they're not even slightly the same from a developer
perspective. People often make that mistake, where technologies are
similar, but neglect the fact that you have to do fundamentally
different things on the devices.
They need to be distinguished. If
>
> I'm not sure I see the idea in having a platform value separate from an OS
> value. Otherwise I agree; OS, architecture, and toolchain should always be
> identifiable.
Platform identifies some sort of common foundation; as dawrin is to OSX/iOS
Linux running on an xbox is still running on an
On 07-11-2011 01:17, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/6/2011 6:40 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:
> On 2011-11-06 04:04:22 +, Walter Bright
said:
>
>> On 11/5/2011 2:07 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> dmd's version identifiers are annoyingly variable (e.g. linux is
camelcased,
>>> whereas Windows is
On 07-11-2011 11:55, Manu wrote:
Both Mac OS X and iOS builds on the same foundation.
True-ish, but they're not even slightly the same from a developer
perspective. People often make that mistake, where technologies are
similar, but neglect the fact that you have to do fundamentally
differe
>
> Both Mac OS X and iOS builds on the same foundation.
True-ish, but they're not even slightly the same from a developer
perspective. People often make that mistake, where technologies are
similar, but neglect the fact that you have to do fundamentally different
things on the devices.
They need
On 2011-11-07 09:23, Manu wrote:
I've been running into this problem on consoles.
I'd vote for creating a standard, only creating new identifiers
according to that standard, and also adding standardised versions of
existing identifiers (leaving also the ones don't conform, possibly
remove them in
I've been running into this problem on consoles.
I'd vote for creating a standard, only creating new identifiers according
to that standard, and also adding standardised versions of existing
identifiers (leaving also the ones don't conform, possibly remove them in
D3)
The __APPLE__ one is a proble
On Sunday, November 06, 2011 16:17:59 Walter Bright wrote:
> And finally, there is no such thing as a "sane" version identifier scheme.
> For one thing, OS vendors do not pick sane names. OS/2 is not an
> identifier. Neither is OS X. Nor is GNU/Linux. Nor do the OS vendors pick
> any sane identifie
On 11/6/2011 6:40 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:
> On 2011-11-06 04:04:22 +, Walter Bright said:
>
>> On 11/5/2011 2:07 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> dmd's version identifiers are annoyingly variable (e.g. linux is camelcased,
>>> whereas Windows is Pascal-cased and OSX is all uppercase).
>>
>> W
On 2011-11-06 04:04:22 +, Walter Bright said:
On 11/5/2011 2:07 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
dmd's version identifiers are annoyingly variable (e.g. linux is camelcased,
whereas Windows is Pascal-cased and OSX is all uppercase).
What they do is follow the casing and spelling of the pre-de
On 06-11-2011 13:07, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:j95116$79g$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 11/5/2011 2:07 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
dmd's version identifiers are annoyingly variable (e.g. linux is
camelcased,
whereas Windows is Pascal-cased and OSX is all upperca
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:j95116$79g$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 11/5/2011 2:07 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> dmd's version identifiers are annoyingly variable (e.g. linux is
>> camelcased,
>> whereas Windows is Pascal-cased and OSX is all uppercase).
>
> What they do is follow the
On 11/5/2011 2:07 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
dmd's version identifiers are annoyingly variable (e.g. linux is camelcased,
whereas Windows is Pascal-cased and OSX is all uppercase).
What they do is follow the casing and spelling of the pre-defined macros of the
local C compiler.
On 05-11-2011 22:07, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, November 05, 2011 20:48:32 Iain Buclaw wrote:
I have had a recent pull request regarding the updating of some of GDC's OS
and Arch version identifiers.
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/pull-request/2/make-some-system-and-cpu-ve
rsion
S
On Saturday, November 05, 2011 20:48:32 Iain Buclaw wrote:
> I have had a recent pull request regarding the updating of some of GDC's OS
> and Arch version identifiers.
>
> https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/pull-request/2/make-some-system-and-cpu-ve
> rsion
>
> Such changes include, aix -> AIX; A
I have had a recent pull request regarding the updating of some of GDC's OS
and Arch version identifiers.
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/pull-request/2/make-some-system-and-cpu-version
Such changes include, aix -> AIX; ALPHA -> Alpha; and a few more.
While I welcome any change suggestions,
29 matches
Mail list logo
