On Thursday, October 10, 2013 05:14:26 Jesse Phillips wrote:
> There is little documentation on how to handle the situation the
> Review Manager is currently facing. I would like to open this
> discussion to point out why, and to poll for if we should have
> any.
>
> The reason is that our process
On Thursday, October 10, 2013 13:57:36 Dicebot wrote:
> It is pretty clear though that this voting has shown certain weak
> spot in out adoption process for more controversial proposals.
> Once person (review manager) simply should not have that much
> decision power in such situation.
I agree. I
On Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 11:57:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 03:14:30 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
Dicebot, consider what information may help make your
decision. Would yes votes including positive feedback help (it
is easier to side with those providing an argumen
On Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 03:14:30 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
Dicebot, consider what information may help make your decision.
Would yes votes including positive feedback help (it is easier
to side with those providing an argument)?
Yes, that will help. If anyone who has voted "Yes" will
On Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 03:14:30 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
There is little documentation on how to handle the situation
the Review Manager is currently facing. I would like to open
this discussion to point out why, and to poll for if we should
have any.
The reason is that our process
There is little documentation on how to handle the situation the
Review Manager is currently facing. I would like to open this
discussion to point out why, and to poll for if we should have
any.
The reason is that our process comes from the the Boost review,
and there is no such definition[1]
