== Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:35 PM, zsxxsz wrote:
> > Hi, below are the functions from Phobos and Tango with the same use, we can
> > see why so many people like Tango more than Phobos.
> Uh, who exactly are you trying to co
zsxxsz wrote:
Hi, below are the functions from Phobos and Tango with the same use, we can
see why so many people like Tango more than Phobos.
[snip]
We can see the function's performance from Tango is more high than which one
from Phobos. This maybe not the only one function difference. :)
Th
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:35 PM, zsxxsz wrote:
> Hi, below are the functions from Phobos and Tango with the same use, we can
> see why so many people like Tango more than Phobos.
Uh, who exactly are you trying to convince?
For that matter, what's the point of this thread?
zsxxsz wrote:
Hi, below are the functions from Phobos and Tango with the same use, we can
see why so many people like Tango more than Phobos.
In Phobos:
string encode(string s)
{
// The ifs are (temprarily, we hope) necessary, because
// std.string.write.replace
// does not do cop
Hi, below are the functions from Phobos and Tango with the same use, we can
see why so many people like Tango more than Phobos.
>>> In Phobos:
string encode(string s)
{
// The ifs are (temprarily, we hope) necessary, because
// std.string.write.replace
// does not do copy-on-write, bu
