On 16/11/09 04:27, Don wrote:
Before TDPL is published, I think we should finally get rid of C-style
declarations.
Yes please.
Don schrieb:
Before TDPL is published, I think we should finally get rid of C-style
declarations. Supporting two styles of declarations just causes
confusion, and AFAIK it doesn't have any benefits -- for example, it
doesn't significantly help in porting code from C. D declarations are
just be
Don Wrote:
> Before TDPL is published, I think we should finally get rid of C-style
> declarations. Supporting two styles of declarations just causes
> confusion, and AFAIK it doesn't have any benefits -- for example, it
> doesn't significantly help in porting code from C. D declarations are
>
Don Wrote:
> Before TDPL is published, I think we should finally get rid of C-style
> declarations. Supporting two styles of declarations just causes
> confusion, and AFAIK it doesn't have any benefits -- for example, it
> doesn't significantly help in porting code from C. D declarations are
>
Andrei Alexandrescu schrieb:
> ...(such as "length" in array index expressions) ...
finally yay!
Thanks Don for keeping this page up to date:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel
#ponce:
> Yes please. There is no real use for:
> int myvar[4];
>
> instead of:
> int[4] myvar;
>
> and porting from C requires some rewriting anyway.
When you translate this C code:
int a[4][10];
You have to remember to invert them to convert them to D:
int[10][4] a;
As time passes, D gets l
Don wrote:
Before TDPL is published, I think we should finally get rid of C-style
declarations. Supporting two styles of declarations just causes
confusion, and AFAIK it doesn't have any benefits -- for example, it
doesn't significantly help in porting code from C. D declarations are
just bett
Don Wrote:
> Before TDPL is published, I think we should finally get rid of C-style
> declarations. Supporting two styles of declarations just causes
> confusion, and AFAIK it doesn't have any benefits -- for example, it
> doesn't significantly help in porting code from C. D declarations are
>
Don wrote:
> Before TDPL is published, I think we should finally get rid of C-style
> declarations. Supporting two styles of declarations just causes
> confusion, and AFAIK it doesn't have any benefits -- for example, it
> doesn't significantly help in porting code from C. D declarations are
> just
Before TDPL is published, I think we should finally get rid of C-style
declarations. Supporting two styles of declarations just causes
confusion, and AFAIK it doesn't have any benefits -- for example, it
doesn't significantly help in porting code from C. D declarations are
just better. And ther
11 matches
Mail list logo
