On 25/01/10 04:01, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:58:13 +0100, Eldar Insafutdinov
wrote:
Jason House Wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
is std.stream rewrite s
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
Documentation. The Phobos docs are rather bad, and don'
Walter Bright, el 24 de enero a las 20:33 me escribiste:
> Ellery Newcomer wrote:
> >Not that I know anything about GSoC, but do you think such a
> >project make a good target for Google summer of code?
>
> I know less than nothing about that.
The backend is not free, only FLOSS projects can appl
grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
Documentation. The Phobos docs are rather bad, and don't even include
the core mod
Don wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
Documentation. The Phobos docs are rather bad, and don't even include
the core modules. Also there'
Jason House wrote:
What's left?
Getting D1 finished first. Why do people keep asking???
Stewart.
dsimcha wrote:
> Are you suggesting that we just get different syntax for it, or is the
> suggestion
> deeper? I don't think there's any chance of us getting rid of default
> initializers this late in the game, and I think it's absolutely essential for
> generic code that there be an easy way to
grauzone wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
Documentation. The Phobos docs are rather bad, and don't even include
the core modules. Also there's std.thread
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Not that I know anything about GSoC, but do you think such a project
make a good target for Google summer of code?
I know less than nothing about that.
Robert Jacques wrote:
But don't 16-bit and 32-bit x86 have the same number of registers, while
x86-64 doubled them? Which should result in ABI changes, etc in addition
to optimizer changes.
No optimizer changes, ABI changes are minor.
On 01/24/2010 08:59 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
I'll have a big problem with the (nonexistent) 64 bit linker on Windows,
and a lesser problem with the nonexistent debugger and librarian. That
means that the first 64 bit dmd will be for Linux/OSX.
Not that I know anything about GSoC, but do you th
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:59:38 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
Just out of curiosity, how hard is 64-bit to implement given that you
already have
a 32-bit compiler?
Shouldn't be that bad. After all, the current code generator survived
going from 16 to 32 bits with about 90% of
Walter Bright wrote:
> ...
> I'll have a big problem with the (nonexistent) 64 bit linker on Windows,
> and a lesser problem with the nonexistent debugger and librarian. That
> means that the first 64 bit dmd will be for Linux/OSX.
Maybe it's time to switch to using the GNU tools on WindoMaybe it
dsimcha wrote:
Just out of curiosity, how hard is 64-bit to implement given that you already
have
a 32-bit compiler?
Shouldn't be that bad. After all, the current code generator survived
going from 16 to 32 bits with about 90% of it unchanged.
Probably a lot more work will go into writing t
Am 25.01.2010, 03:08 Uhr, schrieb dsimcha :
Just out of curiosity, how hard is 64-bit to implement given that you
already have a 32-bit compiler?
According to LuaJIT, a 64Bit code generator isn't that easy even if you
already have a 32Bit one.
http://luajit.org/sponsors.html etc.
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > D2 seems to be close to be declared stable. I would also like to know
> > if 64 bit support is going to be the next thing on the list? In my
> > opinion it is much more important than any feature (AST
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:43:28 +0100, Walter Bright
wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
D2 seems to be close to be declared stable. I would also like to know
if 64 bit support is going to be the next thing on the list? In my
opinion it is much more important than any feature (AST macros,
annotati
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
D2 seems to be close to be declared stable. I would also like to know
if 64 bit support is going to be the next thing on the list? In my
opinion it is much more important than any feature (AST macros,
annotations etc). MS is pushing Windows 7 in 64 bit version. It is
the
== Quote from Denis Koroskin (2kor...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:38:50 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
> > Don wrote:
> >> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >>> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> Jesse Phillips Wrote:
>
> > Jason House wrote:
> >
> >> Andrei's fini
Denis Koroskin wrote:
I strongly believe D should get rid of T.init; I hope I'll find some
time to write a proposal and a rationale for it.
Interesting. I suggest you hurry - now is the time!
Andrei
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:38:50 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference
On 1/23/10 18:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 1/22/10 17:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference a
grauzone Wrote:
> Jason House wrote:
> > Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?),
> > and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
>
> Documentation. The Phobos docs are rather bad, and don't even include
> the core modules. Also there
On 22/01/10 10:42, Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
D2 seems to be close to be declared stable. I would also like to know
if 64 bit support is going to be the next thing on the list? In my
opinion it is much more important than any feature (AST macros,
annotations etc). MS is pushing Windows 7 in 64 bit
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
This page[
grauzone wrote:
Yes, but ctors with empty argument list aren't coming to D anyway.
Yeah. That was kinda the point. We wants them, though.
--
Simen
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:12:47 +0100, grauzone wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean i
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:58:13 +0100, Eldar Insafutdinov
wrote:
Jason House Wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
is std.stream rewrite still on the list?
I managed to read
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:12:47 +0100, grauzone wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jason House Wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
is std.stream rewrite still on the list?
Trying...
Andrei
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
Documentation. The Phobos docs are rather bad, and don't even include
the core modules. Also there's std.thread, shouldn't it be c
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
Jason House Wrote:
> Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?), and
> Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
is std.stream rewrite still on the list?
grauzone Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> >
> >> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> >>> Jesse Phillips Wrote:
> >>>
> Jason House wrote:
>
> > Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
> > std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forw
Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
This page[1] has been getting regular
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
This page[1] has been getting regular updates, so
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
This page[1] has been ge
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:51:19 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. Wha
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:27:02 +0100, bearophile
wrote:
Thank you for your answers Simen kjaeraas.
No need for them when we have this: S s = S( 4 );<
If you have to initialize an array of many structs you have to repeat
the name of the struct many times, this is redundant, and takes more
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:51:19 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
This page
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> > Jesse Phillips Wrote:
> >
> >> Jason House wrote:
> >>
> >>> Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?),
> >>> and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
> >> This page[1] has be
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
This page[1] has been getting regular updates, so it should do a good
job answer
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 1/22/10 17:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
This page[1] has b
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:00:32PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> What about the uniform function call syntax ?
Yes, please!
--
Adam D. Ruppe
http://arsdnet.net
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:00:32 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> What about the uniform function call syntax ?
It might require more useless bikeshedding before anything can be decided.
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
> Jason House wrote:
>
> > Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?),
> > and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
>
> This page[1] has been getting regular updates, so it should do a good
> job answering the qu
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:27:02 -0500, bearophile wrote:
> Thank you for your answers Simen kjaeraas.
>
>>No need for them when we have this: S s = S( 4 );<
>
> If you have to initialize an array of many structs you have to repeat
> the name of the struct many times, this is redundant, and takes more
On 1/22/10 17:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
This page[1] has been getting regular upd
Don wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Thank you for your answers Simen kjaeraas.
No need for them when we have this: S s = S( 4 );<
If you have to initialize an array of many structs you have to repeat
the name of the struct many times, this is redundant, and takes more
space (and if you don't use
bearophile wrote:
Thank you for your answers Simen kjaeraas.
No need for them when we have this: S s = S( 4 );<
If you have to initialize an array of many structs you have to repeat the name
of the struct many times, this is redundant, and takes more space (and if you
don't use an IDE it ne
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:21:09 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What
Thank you for your answers Simen kjaeraas.
>No need for them when we have this: S s = S( 4 );<
If you have to initialize an array of many structs you have to repeat the name
of the struct many times, this is redundant, and takes more space (and if you
don't use an IDE it needs more time to type
On 2010-01-22 11:21:09 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
said:
# Remove "length" from array index expressions ( Bugzilla:3474).
Dunno. Hope so! TDPL won't mention it, so it's real bad if the feature stays,
Agree. That one must go.
At the very list it should be an error if it shadows any other sym
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:21:09 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating
std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE
bugs. What's left?
This page[1] has
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:50:17 +0100, bearophile
wrote:
Jesse Phillips:
This page[1] has been getting regular updates, so it should do a good
job answering the question.
1. http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel#FutureDirections
Most things on that page seems OK and not too muc
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We have a design that partially resolves it. Steve Schveighoffer has
implemented it.
What I meant here is: Steve has implemented the design in addition to
participating to it.
Andrei
Jason House wrote:
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?), and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
This page[1] has been getting regular updates, so it should do a good
job answering the
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
> Jason House wrote:
>
> > Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?),
> > and Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
>
> This page[1] has been getting regular updates, so it should do a good
> job answering the qu
Jason House Wrote:
> Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?), and
> Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
D2 seems to be close to be declared stable. I would also like to know if 64 bit
support is going to be the next thing on the l
Jesse Phillips:
> This page[1] has been getting regular updates, so it should do a good
> job answering the question.
> 1. http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel#FutureDirections
Most things on that page seems OK and not too much complex to understand. There
are two things in that p
Jason House wrote:
> Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?), and
> Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
This page[1] has been getting regular updates, so it should do a good
job answering the question.
1. http://www.prowiki.org/wi
Andrei's finishing his last TDPL chapter, Sean is updating std.thread(?), and
Walter's been fixing forward reference and CTFE bugs. What's left?
62 matches
Mail list logo
