Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote in message
news:jkkbqv$2pvu$3...@digitalmars.com...
On 03/24/2012 07:42 AM, Dan wrote:
Since there is CTFE, I keep running into, do I really need this as a
template parameter? Why not put this in a constructor. And so on...
You use templates in
On Sunday, March 25, 2012 17:55:56 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote in message
news:jkkbqv$2pvu$3...@digitalmars.com...
On 03/24/2012 07:42 AM, Dan wrote:
Since there is CTFE, I keep running into, do I really need this as a
template parameter? Why not put this in
On 26 March 2012 12:35, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 25, 2012 17:55:56 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Yea, the general rule of thumb is If you can do it with CTFE, then do so,
otherwise use templates.
Generally, you end up having to use templates for stuff that
On Monday, March 26, 2012 12:39:36 James Miller wrote:
Often I end up using the same function in CTFE and runtime.
That's pretty much the idea behind CTFE in the first place.
- Jonathan M Davis
Since there is CTFE, I keep running into, do I really need this
as a template parameter? Why not put this in a constructor. And
so on...
On 03/24/2012 07:42 AM, Dan wrote:
Since there is CTFE, I keep running into, do I really need this as a
template parameter? Why not put this in a constructor. And so on...
You use templates in combination with CTFE if
- You have to perform computations on types.
- You want template
