On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 01:52:51 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
They've now renamed Syphilis, et al. after Subaru's highest-end
Impreza? *shakes head*. Who wants to bet *that* little bit of
PC rubble-bouncing was spearheaded by someone with a vested
interest in the Viper or Corvette or
On 09/22/2016 11:41 AM, Chris wrote:
Around every two years they come up with something new, give or take a
year depending on the topic. In general, I got the impression that once
I've finally got used to using a certain term, it's no longer
(politically or otherwise) correct, e.g. "STD" =>
On Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 15:22:57 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 09/22/2016 07:43 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/20/16 3:14 PM, Intersteller wrote:
TL;DR: I like and have used Go extensively. I glanced at D for
20
minutes and didn't like it.
Grumpy old curmudgeon says:
On 09/22/2016 07:43 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/20/16 3:14 PM, Intersteller wrote:
TL;DR: I like and have used Go extensively. I glanced at D for 20
minutes and didn't like it.
Grumpy old curmudgeon says: "Harumpf...Why back in my day, we pronounced
'TL;DR' as 'summary'...or
On 9/20/16 3:14 PM, Intersteller wrote:
TL;DR: I like and have used Go extensively. I glanced at D for 20
minutes and didn't like it.
-Steve
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:14:41 UTC, Intersteller wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
commonly used functionality, and that it looks like it is dying
suggests that putting any effort in to it will be a waste. Go,
OTH, has tons of frameworks, most are
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:14:41 UTC, Intersteller wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
commonly used functionality, and that it looks like it is dying
suggests that putting any effort in to it will be a waste. Go,
OTH, has tons of frameworks, most are
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 18:00:14 UTC, Chris wrote:
tldr; vibe.d helps you to set up web servers, but you have to
know web related stuff too - or be willing to learn it as you
go along. It's not straight out of the box.
The tutorials page is not the prettiest page in the world.
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 17:22:26 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
I agree, but it is easier to learn those things if you're using
a different language, due to the assumption with vibe.d that
you've got that background.
Yeah, I think that's the basic problem with people's expectations
of
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 16:13:13 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 13:56:01 UTC, Nick
Sabalausky wrote:
On 09/20/2016 03:14 PM, Intersteller wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
http://vibed.org/docs
http://vibed.org/api
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 17:05:41 UTC, Chris wrote:
found out that it's not vibe.d's lack of documentation, but how
servers work that is the biggest obstacle. Once you know how
certain things work, it's no longer so hard find out how to do
it with vibe.d, e.g. when and how to set
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 16:13:13 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
To someone like me, who has done little web development, that
documentation isn't very helpful. I have copies of both D Web
Development and Learning D (which includes a nice example) and
*that* got me going. Overall, there are
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 13:56:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 09/20/2016 03:14 PM, Intersteller wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
http://vibed.org/docs
http://vibed.org/api
There's also two examples right on the homepage. Did you try
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 13:56:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 09/20/2016 03:14 PM, Intersteller wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
http://vibed.org/docs
http://vibed.org/api
There's also two examples right on the homepage. Did you try
14 months ago i tried to write my first webapp. initially i chose
vibe.d to be my framework. i got a simple app running quickly,
but due to my lack of knowledge about webapps in general i got
stuck at rather fundamental things. like doing authentication
over oauth, or even have a rough
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:56:01 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Not to be a dick, but you really didn't look *at all*, did you?
You *are* being a dick. Please stop it.
When someone takes the time to post something like this, they are
reporting the pain they experienced. They might not articulate
...I could care less why you are switching to Go...
On 09/20/2016 03:14 PM, Intersteller wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
http://vibed.org/docs
http://vibed.org/api
There's also two examples right on the homepage. Did you try scrolling?
I'll grant that the stupid "modern" sales-pitch-first,
On Wednesday, 21 September 2016 at 01:15:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 20:59:18 UTC, wobbles wrote:
I would say otherwise. I've built multiple sites in vibe-d, so
I probably wouldn't need them, but having a vibe-d specific
beginner tutorial from start to end of a
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 20:59:18 UTC, wobbles wrote:
I would say otherwise. I've built multiple sites in vibe-d, so
I probably wouldn't need them, but having a vibe-d specific
beginner tutorial from start to end of a project would be great.
Tutorial != doc.
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 22:17:26 UTC, WhatMeWorry wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 20:35:49 UTC, Daniel Koz
wrote:
Dne 20.9.2016 v 22:01 Karabuta via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
[...]
Nothing of this is specific for vibe.d, so I do not see any
reason to have doc about this in
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 21:19:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
My fault. I was speaking about doc (API), I do not say anything
about tutorial and so on. Yes I belive having more tutorials
and howtos it is a good thing.
I don't think anyone would disagree wrt tutorials and how tos. I
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 20:35:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Dne 20.9.2016 v 22:01 Karabuta via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
[...]
Nothing of this is specific for vibe.d, so I do not see any
reason to have doc about this in vibe.d
Could he be asking for little examples of the above
Dne 20.9.2016 v 22:59 wobbles via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 20:35:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Dne 20.9.2016 v 22:01 Karabuta via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:47:12 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 20:35:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Dne 20.9.2016 v 22:01 Karabuta via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:47:12 UTC, WebFreak001
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:14:41 UTC, Intersteller
wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the
Dne 20.9.2016 v 22:01 Karabuta via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:47:12 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:14:41 UTC, Intersteller wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
commonly used functionality, and that
Dne 20.9.2016 v 22:00 cym13 via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:47:01 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:16:04 UTC, cym13 wrote:
What exactly makes you think vibe is dying?
His first post is from 6 days ago, so I would guess that he doesn't
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:47:12 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:14:41 UTC, Intersteller
wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
commonly used functionality, and that it looks like it is
dying suggests that putting any effort in
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:47:01 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:16:04 UTC, cym13 wrote:
What exactly makes you think vibe is dying?
His first post is from 6 days ago, so I would guess that he
doesn't seem to have much of a sense of its history.
Which makes
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:14:41 UTC, Intersteller wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
commonly used functionality, and that it looks like it is dying
suggests that putting any effort in to it will be a waste. Go,
OTH, has tons of frameworks, most are
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:16:04 UTC, cym13 wrote:
What exactly makes you think vibe is dying?
His first post is from 6 days ago, so I would guess that he
doesn't seem to have much of a sense of its history.
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:16:04 UTC, cym13 wrote:
What exactly makes you think vibe is dying?
it lacks the documentation?
Dne 20.9.2016 v 21:14 Intersteller via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation, commonly
used functionality, and that it looks like it is dying suggests that
putting any effort in to it will be a waste. Go, OTH, has tons of
frameworks, most are
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 19:14:41 UTC, Intersteller wrote:
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
commonly used functionality, and that it looks like it is dying
suggests that putting any effort in to it will be a waste. Go,
OTH, has tons of frameworks, most are
Vibe.d looks great on the surface but lack of documentation,
commonly used functionality, and that it looks like it is dying
suggests that putting any effort in to it will be a waste. Go,
OTH, has tons of frameworks, most are actively support, very well
documented(beego, revel, etc), and
35 matches
Mail list logo
