Dnia 14-07-2010 o 13:32:44 Alix Pexton alix.dot.pex...@gmail.dot.com
napisał(a):
DuplexRange.vote++;
++vote
And it's already used for with similar meaning:
...can communicate with one another in both directions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duplex_(telecommunications)
Tomek
On 12 July 2010 21:28, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
sort is all but deprecated, since std.algorithm.sort exists.
reverse could even more easily be implemented as a library function
than
sort, it should be removed as well.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 07/12/2010 02:28 PM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
sort is all but deprecated, since std.algorithm.sort exists.
reverse could even more easily be implemented as a library
function than sort, it should be removed as well.
On 13/07/2010 20:26, eris wrote:
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
erisjvbur...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:i1i4bs$1c0...@digitalmars.com...
It's an improvement, but I believe the proper English prefix for something
that is doubly-reflective in that sense is Duplex. It's also easier and
shorter
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:42:49 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'd to do some more renaming around Phobos and figure out an approach to
deprecating names that aren't longer used.
I'm thinking:
std.conv - std.conversion
Rationale: it's a seldom typed name so shortening it is just odd
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:57:36 -0400, bearophile wrote:
std.concurrency/std.thread = std.concurrency
std.thread doesn't exist anymore. It was moved into druntime and is now
core.thread. (But it is still listed in the Phobos documentation menu as
std.thread, which is very confusing.)
-Lars
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:53:00 -0400, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
std.metastrings/std.traits = std.meta
I like this a *lot*.
Red flag here -- isn't the proposed keyword to replace __traits meta? If
that goes through, meta isn't a valid module name.
-Steve
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:42:49 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
put(R, E) - putNext(R, E)
Rationale: conveys the notion that there is progress in the output.
Can we have E getNext(R) also for completeness :) Then an input range can
be defined similarly to
On 07/13/2010 06:23 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:42:49 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
put(R, E) - putNext(R, E)
Rationale: conveys the notion that there is progress in the output.
Can we have E getNext(R) also for completeness :)
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
std.stdio - std.io
Rationale: stuttering sucks.
Absolutely.
BidirectionalRange - DoublyEndedRange
Rationale: bidirectional suggests something that can move *in* either
direction, whereas in fact the range can be shortened from either end.
It's an
On 07/13/2010 11:30 AM, eris wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
std.stdio - std.io
Rationale: stuttering sucks.
Absolutely.
BidirectionalRange - DoublyEndedRange
Rationale: bidirectional suggests something that can move *in*
either direction, whereas in fact the range can be shortened
On Jul 14, 10 00:30, eris wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
std.stdio - std.io
Rationale: stuttering sucks.
Absolutely.
BidirectionalRange - DoublyEndedRange
Rationale: bidirectional suggests something that can move *in* either
direction, whereas in fact the range can be shortened
eris jvbur...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:i1i4bs$1c0...@digitalmars.com...
It's an improvement, but I believe the proper English prefix for something
that is doubly-reflective in that sense is Duplex. It's also easier and
shorter to pronounce. Say it with me now:
DuplexRange
I'm a
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
eris jvbur...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:i1i4bs$1c0...@digitalmars.com...
It's an improvement, but I believe the proper English prefix for something
that is doubly-reflective in that sense is Duplex. It's also easier and
shorter to pronounce. Say it with
Just though I'd post here on something that made me question my sanity late
one night.
I was working on some test code and for some reason put parens around
myArray.reverse. After that the compiler complained that reverse was an
unknown identifier. It took me about 30 minutes at 2am to finally
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:16:32 -0400, eris jvbur...@gmail.com wrote:
Just though I'd post here on something that made me question my sanity
late
one night.
I was working on some test code and for some reason put parens around
myArray.reverse. After that the compiler complained that reverse
On 07/12/2010 11:53 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:16:32 -0400, eris jvbur...@gmail.com wrote:
Just though I'd post here on something that made me question my sanity
late
one night.
I was working on some test code and for some reason put parens around
myArray.reverse.
Andrei Alexandrescu:
sort is all but deprecated, since std.algorithm.sort exists.
reverse could even more easily be implemented as a library function than
sort, it should be removed as well.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_algorithm.html#reverse
D site can enjoy a page that
On 07/12/2010 02:28 PM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
sort is all but deprecated, since std.algorithm.sort exists.
reverse could even more easily be implemented as a library
function than sort, it should be removed as well.
Andrei Alexandrescu:
std.conv - std.conversion
OK.
std.stdio - std.io
OK.
put(R, E) - putNext(R, E)
Uhm. I don't like this a lot.
BidirectionalRange - DoublyEndedRange
Acceptable.
More suggestions:
std.cover = std.coverage
Rationale: this module is not used very often, so by Zipf
On Monday, July 12, 2010 12:42:49 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 07/12/2010 02:28 PM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
sort is all but deprecated, since std.algorithm.sort exists.
reverse could even more easily be implemented as a library
function than sort, it should be removed
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:i1fs3g$2ev...@digitalmars.com...
Andrei Alexandrescu:
std.stdio - std.io
I think this was brought up before and Walter didn't like it because he felt
that putting it in the std package didn't make it blatantly obvious that
it was
On 07/12/2010 12:42 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Would this be an improvement?
Yes. I approve enough to come out of lurking. (Though I do agree with
Nick on DoubleEndedRange)
- Brian
23 matches
Mail list logo
