On 8/23/10 5:14 CDT, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 02:48:51 -0400, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:i4kv18$14q...@digitalmars.com...
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Ok
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:i4kv18$14q...@digitalmars.com...
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Ok that seems to be the case. See the attached screenshot. But it works fine
on Linux though (assuming you add the proper ./,
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Trick what into what?
Ok that seems to be the case. See the attached screenshot. But it works fine
on Linux though (assuming you add the proper ./, of course).
Something else
Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote in message
news:i4mfpe$2cj...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Trick what into what?
See the screenshot I attached to that post. That should clarify what I mean.
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Anyway, console output is broken in phobos.
In what way?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2742
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Ok that seems to be the case. See the attached screenshot. But it works fine
on Linux though (assuming you add the proper ./, of course).
Looks like execv doesn't wait for
Kagamin Wrote:
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Ok that seems to be the case. See the attached screenshot. But it works
fine
on Linux though (assuming you add the proper ./, of course).
Looks like execv doesn't wait for
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Ok that seems to be the case. See the attached screenshot. But it works fine
on Linux though (assuming you add the proper ./, of course).
Also I'm not sure you can implement
On 08/20/2010 01:44 PM, Kagamin wrote:
Kagamin Wrote:
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Ok that seems to be the case. See the attached screenshot. But it works fine
on Linux though (assuming you add the proper ./, of course).
Looks like
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Try to sleep after execv.
I think a form of join/wait is more appropriate.
That should be done inside execv.
If one wants to join in user code, execv should return a waitable handle.
Hmm msdn says it works in posix way. The problem seems to be cmd waits on
Kagamin Wrote:
Hmm msdn says it works in posix way. The problem seems to be cmd waits on
parent process and when parent exits, cmd prints command prompt, but child is
still running.
No, it doesn't say it works in posix way, it only says execv doesn't return.
Kagamin Wrote:
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Something else interesting to note for anyone who didn't already know (like
me), is that if you change the body of execA's main to:
write(In A); // Note this doesn't automatically flush
system(execB);
Then the output is backwards (on
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Something else interesting to note for anyone who didn't already know (like
me), is that if you change the body of execA's main to:
write(In A); // Note this doesn't automatically flush
system(execB);
Then the output is backwards (on either Windows or Linux):
Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote in message
news:i4mksr$2f...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Something else interesting to note for anyone who didn't already know
(like
me), is that if you change the body of execA's main to:
write(In A); // Note this doesn't automatically flush
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:i4mmg2$a1...@digitalmars.com...
Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote in message
news:i4mif8$2p1...@digitalmars.com...
Kagamin Wrote:
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Ok that seems to be the
Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote in message
news:i4mif8$2p1...@digitalmars.com...
Kagamin Wrote:
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Ok that seems to be the case. See the attached screenshot. But it works
fine
on Linux though (assuming
16 matches
Mail list logo
