On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 11:50:35 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/30/16 5:26 PM, deadalnix wrote:
I take that, as you weren't there at the 2016 event, it was
reiterated
in 2016.
Timon was at dconf 2016. I don't recall it being discussed
either, but maybe in a small discussion?
I
On 7/30/16 5:26 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 21:21:30 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 30.07.2016 22:58, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The one that needs to be convinced is Walter.
IIRC he said at DConf that it should be fixed.
We did a tour of DConf 2015 with Davi
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 21:21:30 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 30.07.2016 22:58, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The one that needs to be convinced is Walter.
IIRC he said at DConf that it should be fixed.
We did a tour of DConf 2015 with David Nadlinger and everybody
was super c
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 19:21:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I think that Walter's answer in those bug reports is pretty
clear. An alias parameter aliases a symbol. Basic types are
keywords, not symbols, so they can't be passed as an argument
to an alias parameter.
alias bind to built
On 30.07.2016 22:58, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The one that needs to be convinced is Walter.
IIRC he said at DConf that it should be fixed.
On Saturday, July 30, 2016 19:41:27 Lodovico Giaretta via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 19:21:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > I think that Walter's answer in those bug reports is pretty
> > clear.
>
> Thank you for your answer.
> I asked because I also found this[1], so I
On 07/30/2016 09:21 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I think that Walter's answer in those bug reports is pretty clear. An alias
parameter aliases a symbol. Basic types are keywords, not symbols, so they
can't be passed as an argument to an alias parameter.
As far as I see, he just
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 19:21:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I think that Walter's answer in those bug reports is pretty
clear.
Thank you for your answer.
I asked because I also found this[1], so I hoped it was going to
change.
[1]
http://forum.dlang.org/post/lnaidcyffgqkvekaw...@foru
On Saturday, July 30, 2016 18:53:43 Lodovico Giaretta via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this has been discussed before (like, before I started
> using D on a daily basis and hanging around in the forums), but...
>
> Is there a reason why alias parameters do not accept basic types?
> Will th
Hi,
I know this has been discussed before (like, before I started
using D on a daily basis and hanging around in the forums), but...
Is there a reason why alias parameters do not accept basic types?
Will this be changed somewhere in the future, as many asked for
it? It is very surprising the
10 matches
Mail list logo