On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Flamaros flamaros.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
http://herbsutter.com/2013/02/11/atomic-weapons-the-c-memory-model-and-modern-hardware/
Is D and DMD aware of those kind of issues with atomic?
I think more thought needs to be given to how the compiler recognizes
On Jul 8, 2013, at 5:05 PM, Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de wrote:
Fortunately on x86
architectures at least, atomic operations are pretty sane and
fast.
The x86 memory model is sufficiently strict that, by and large, simple
concurrent interactions actually work without any memory barriers at
On 07/08/2013 09:04 PM, Flamaros wrote:
http://herbsutter.com/2013/02/11/atomic-weapons-the-c-memory-model-and-modern-hardware/
Is D and DMD aware of those kind of issues with atomic?
OT: How does he change slides? I can't see a clicker nor a sign for
somebody off camera?? Anyway, awesome
http://herbsutter.com/2013/02/11/atomic-weapons-the-c-memory-model-and-modern-hardware/
Is D and DMD aware of those kind of issues with atomic?
Am Mon, 08 Jul 2013 21:04:01 +0200
schrieb Flamaros flamaros.xav...@gmail.com:
http://herbsutter.com/2013/02/11/atomic-weapons-the-c-memory-model-and-modern-hardware/
Is D and DMD aware of those kind of issues with atomic?
I haven't looked into the talk, but I can say this: D offers
atomic