Justin:
>Is there a reason that the compiler makes the assumptions it does or is this a
>bug? I did try searching the bugzilla with a few different queries, but failed
>to turn up anything that looked likely.<
I don't know if it can be considered a bug, or just a design error. What I know
is t
Reply to Jarrett,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Justin wrote:
I was writing some unittests when I ran across some rather unexpected
behavior in which strings in an array were being trimmed to the
length of the first element. Running this program:
import std.stdio;
void main() {
auto string
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Justin wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
>> There's two annoying things going on here:
>>
>> 1) The type of string literals is not char[], it's char[n] where n is
>> the length of the string. I don't know why this is.
>> 2) With array literals, the compiler simpl
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> There's two annoying things going on here:
>
> 1) The type of string literals is not char[], it's char[n] where n is
> the length of the string. I don't know why this is.
> 2) With array literals, the compiler simply determines the type of the
> array as being a dynam
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Justin wrote:
> I was writing some unittests when I ran across some rather unexpected
> behavior in which strings in an array were being trimmed to the length of the
> first element. Running this program:
>
> import std.stdio;
> void main() {
> auto strings
I was writing some unittests when I ran across some rather unexpected behavior
in which strings in an array were being trimmed to the length of the first
element. Running this program:
import std.stdio;
void main() {
auto strings = ["hello", "cruelly", "innovative", "world"];
wri
