https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8781522
http://arthurtw.github.io/2014/12/21/rust-anti-sloppy-programming-language.html
c'est possible!
Oh how much free time and stability there would be if D core
*moved* GC downstream.
Vic
ps: more cows waiting for slaughter:
http://dlang.org/comparis
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:28:16 +
Vic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8781522
>
> http://arthurtw.github.io/2014/12/21/rust-anti-sloppy-programming-language.html
>
> c'est possible!
>
> Oh how much free time and stability there would be if D core
> *moved* GC
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 22:02:46 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
oh, how much usefullness there would be if D core suspended all
other
activities and maked GC on par with "industrial strength" GCs!
i'm trying to tell you that i LOVE GC. and i can't share the
(growing?)
attitute t
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 12:28:18 UTC, Vic wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8781522
http://arthurtw.github.io/2014/12/21/rust-anti-sloppy-programming-language.html
c'est possible!
Oh how much free time and stability there would be if D core
*moved* GC downstream.
Vic
ps: mo
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:02:36AM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> oh, how much usefullness there would be if D core suspended all other
> activities and maked GC on par with "industrial strength" GCs!
>
> i'm trying to tell you that i LOVE GC. and i can't share the
> (growing?) att
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 22:09:22 +
Kapps via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 22:02:46 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >
> > oh, how much usefullness there would be if D core suspended all
> > other
> > activities and maked GC on par with "industrial strength" GCs!
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 22:02:46 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:28:16 +
. what we really need is a
better GC,
not "no GC".
I am not saying no GC; I am saying:
a) something needs to be moved out of core. If not GC, what would
you move downstream?
b) m
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 23:21:17 UTC, Vic wrote:
I am not saying no GC; I am saying:
a) something needs to be moved out of core.
And many don't agree.
If not GC, what would you move downstream?
b) move, not remove.
Move where? There is no downstream. There are no hordes of
developer
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 00:49:57 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 23:21:17 UTC, Vic wrote:
I am not saying no GC; I am saying:
a) something needs to be moved out of core.
And many don't agree.
Dear Anonymous,
IMO D needs to be more stable, the alternative is mo
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 03:32:12 UTC, Vic wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 00:49:57 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 23:21:17 UTC, Vic wrote:
I am not saying no GC; I am saying:
a) something needs to be moved out of core.
And many don't agree.
Dear Anonym
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 03:32:11 +
Vic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Hence a prediction: major things will be moved out of core to 3rd
> party plugins to slim down the lang, because now it's more than a
> lang: it is a platform.
D is not a platform. besides, GC is a core feature of D.
signature
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 04:06:33 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 03:32:11 +
Vic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Hence a prediction: major things will be moved out of core to
3rd party plugins to slim down the lang, because now it's more
than a lang: it is a platf
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:16:25 +
Vic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 04:06:33 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 03:32:11 +
> > Vic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >
> >> Hence a prediction: major things will be moved out of core to
> >>
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 14:39:30 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:16:25 +
Vic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 04:06:33 UTC, ketmar via clip
mind if i say that i don't give a shit about what "commercial
users"
want? and the last
It seems that perfection is attained not when there is nothing more to
add, but when there is nothing more to remove.
A. de Saint-Exupery
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Perfection
--
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
sign
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:52:04 +
CraigDillabaugh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> In fairness to commercial users though - and many have shown that
> they are willing to put resources and money into open source
> projects - they naturally need to feel that there is something
> in it for them. They n
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:01:31 +0100
"Jérôme M. Berger" via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> It seems that perfection is attained not when there is nothing more to
> add, but when there is nothing more to remove.
> A. de Saint-Exupery
>
> https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Perfection
Jérôme M. Berger:
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Perfection
This leads to Scheme :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 14:39:30 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
mind if i say that i don't give a shit about what "commercial
users"
want? and the last thing i want is cutting out language
features. yes,
"moving out of the core" == "cutting off". half-baked feature
annoys
people
Vic:
Current situation is we are stuck, ex:
" Anyone want to review these and see what we should add to
Phobos?" from
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Algorithms_to_solve_programming_contest_problems_246363.html#N246363
If D and Phobos become good to solve those contests t
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 19:12:10 +
Vic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> 1)I quote me: "How much $ funding so I consider it?"
> here in D form- http://tinyurl.com/ks7z9jy
you didn't get it. it's not about "where can i put my money", it's
about "ok, so i hiring programmers to do what i want and publish
21 matches
Mail list logo
