Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Aaron Wattersarw1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi guys. D looks cool. A couple of things confuse me.
The first is: what happens if I do a
delete cl;
after storing a reference to cl somewhere? Can I use the stored
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
FWIW, I am trying to convince Walter to not reclaim memory in delete, but
instead only call destructors. D continues C++'s mistake of conflating
lifetime termination with memory reclamation.
Why? Instead
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
FWIW, I am trying to convince Walter to not reclaim memory in delete, but
instead only call destructors. D continues C++'s mistake of conflating
lifetime termination with memory
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
FWIW, I am trying to convince Walter to not reclaim memory in delete, but
instead only
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 8 de agosto a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
FWIW, I am trying to convince Walter to not reclaim memory in delete, but
instead only call destructors. D
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
...
And what if you used it to try to delete a temporary array? Yes, you
could use malloc/free for the temp array, but.. it just seems silly to
have to dip into C functions to do that.
Why? It's not a frequent need.
I use it quite a bit, mostly because scope
Leandro Lucarella, el 8 de agosto a las 11:22 me escribiste:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 8 de agosto a las 08:42 me escribiste:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
FWIW, I am trying to convince Walter to not
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
FWIW, I am trying to convince Walter to not reclaim
On 2009-08-08 09:17:28 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
Great description.
FWIW, I am trying to convince Walter to not reclaim memory in delete,
but instead only call destructors. D continues C++'s mistake of
conflating lifetime termination with memory
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
FWIW, I am trying to convince Walter to not reclaim memory in
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-08-08 09:17:28 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
Great description.
FWIW, I am trying to convince Walter to not reclaim memory in delete,
but instead only call destructors. D continues C++'s mistake of
conflating lifetime
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-08-08 09:17:28 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
Great description.
FWIW, I am trying to convince Walter to not reclaim memory in delete,
but instead only call destructors. D continues C++'s
Jeremie Pelletier:
It's impossible to know if a pointer is unique without scanning the entire
heap and pausing all threads to scan their stacks.
Are you saying this after reading Bartoz blog posts?
Bye,
bearophile
bearophile Wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier:
It's impossible to know if a pointer is unique without scanning the entire
heap and pausing all threads to scan their stacks.
Are you saying this after reading Bartoz blog posts?
Bye,
bearophile
No I haven't, do you have a link?
Jeremie Pelletier:
No I haven't, do you have a link?
With the power of Google this is the blog of Bartosz Milewski, you may read
about the last ten posts or so:
http://bartoszmilewski.wordpress.com/
Bye,
bearophile
Hi guys. D looks cool. A couple of things confuse me.
The first is: what happens if I do a
delete cl;
after storing a reference to cl somewhere? Can I use the stored
reference? Is it invalid? Please elucidate, thanks.
-- Aaron Watters
ps: sorry if this is a repeat, but if it is it
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Aaron Wattersarw1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi guys. D looks cool. A couple of things confuse me.
The first is: what happens if I do a
delete cl;
after storing a reference to cl somewhere? Can I use the stored
reference? Is it invalid? Please elucidate,
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Aaron Wattersarw1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi guys. D looks cool. A couple of things confuse me.
The first is: what happens if I do a
delete cl;
after storing a reference to cl somewhere? Can I use the stored
reference? Is
18 matches
Mail list logo
