On 2013-02-04 23:29, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I wonder whether a big, continuous HTML would be a good possibility.
I would rather like to have a first page which list all symbols with a
filter, just like the Ruby docs:
http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2/4/13 2:08 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:58:35 -0800
Walter Bright wrote:
drop html docs from the dmd distribution?
PLEASE NO.
They seem rather pointless, considering:
1. them being on the web is better anyway
Not when you don't
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:58:35 -0800
> Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>> drop html docs from the dmd distribution?
>
> PLEASE NO.
>
>> They seem rather pointless, considering:
>>
>> 1. them being on the web is better anyway
>
&
On 2/3/2013 3:58 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
They seem rather pointless, considering:
1. them being on the web is better anyway
2. the new pdf version of the spec
Ok, everyone, you made your point! They stay.
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 20:53:32 -0500, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:58:35 -0800
Walter Bright wrote:
drop html docs from the dmd distribution?
PLEASE NO.
They seem rather pointless, considering:
1. them being on the web is better anyway
Not when you don't
On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 23:58:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
They seem rather pointless, considering:
1. them being on the web is better anyway
2. the new pdf version of the spec
I use the included HTML docs when I have no internet
access (e.g. in train, which is 2hr/day for me).
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:58:35 -0800
Walter Bright wrote:
>
> drop html docs from the dmd distribution?
PLEASE NO.
> They seem rather pointless, considering:
>
> 1. them being on the web is better anyway
Not when you don't have internet access or when you need docs an olde
On Monday, 4 February 2013 at 00:26:06 UTC, FG wrote:
On 2013-02-04 00:58, Walter Bright wrote:
They seem rather pointless, considering:
1. them being on the web is better anyway
2. the new pdf version of the spec
Theoretically:
It's useful, because the docs' version matches the compiler,
whi
On 2013-02-04 00:58, Walter Bright wrote:
They seem rather pointless, considering:
1. them being on the web is better anyway
2. the new pdf version of the spec
Theoretically:
It's useful, because the docs' version matches the compiler,
while the website only lists current documentation.
Pract
On 2/4/13, Walter Bright wrote:
> They seem rather pointless, considering:
>
> 1. them being on the web is better anyway
> 2. the new pdf version of the spec
>
They're used for CHM generation.
They seem rather pointless, considering:
1. them being on the web is better anyway
2. the new pdf version of the spec
11 matches
Mail list logo