One of the issues of druntime is that is that almost everything
in it is resolved at runtime. This is good because it avoids
bloat. However, it also means we run into 2 regular issues:
1. Performance (small issue). A lot of code that should be
otherwise fast is slower than it could be, since
monarch_dodra:
So the two challenges are:
1. If we integrate a large amount of template code, where would
it go?
How much large it is?
2. How will we deal with not having massive code duplication?
Go developers accept a little amount of duplication.
But in your case a solution could be
On 2013-09-13 12:26, monarch_dodra wrote:
I had started toying around with this, and the main and immediate
challenge I ran into is the integration of templates. The 2 issues are:
1. All templates must be in object.d, or the compiler won't see it.
Do you know why that is? Can they be put in a
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 10:26:35 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
1. Performance (small issue). A lot of code that should be
otherwise fast is slower than it could be, since druntime will
check, at runtime, if postblit is needed, if destruction should
be done. For example, if you dup a
On Sep 13, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-09-13 12:26, monarch_dodra wrote:
I had started toying around with this, and the main and immediate
challenge I ran into is the integration of templates. The 2 issues are:
1. All templates must be in object.d, or the
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:20:10PM +0200, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 10:26:35 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
1. Performance (small issue). A lot of code that should be
otherwise fast is slower than it could be, since druntime will
check, at runtime, if postblit is needed,
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 17:02:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
For example, dup is not nothrow, yet it is safe and pure.
Reserve is nothrow, yet assumeSafeAppend is not. Reserve may
actually call postblit, but not assumeSafeAppend.
Why is assumeSafeAppend not nothrow? If it were up to me, I'd
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 07:47:32PM +0200, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 17:02:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
For example, dup is not nothrow, yet it is safe and pure.
Reserve is nothrow, yet assumeSafeAppend is not. Reserve may
actually call postblit, but not
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 18:01:30 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 07:47:32PM +0200, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 17:02:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
For example, dup is not nothrow, yet it is safe and pure.
Reserve is nothrow, yet assumeSafeAppend is
