Almost everything in druntime's core.sys.posix is currently ..not..
nothrow. This causes (me) to workaround by wrapping it with try/catch
statements which is completely unnecessary, it would be easier to just
copy those files in the project folder and change them unless they're
updated in the g
And you aren't submitting a pull request with those changes because...
On 4/9/14, 8:47 PM, Etienne wrote:
Almost everything in druntime's core.sys.posix is currently ..not.. nothrow.
This causes (me) to
workaround by wrapping it with try/catch statements which is completely
unnecessary, it wou
On 2014-04-10 00:01, Brad Roberts wrote:
And you aren't submitting a pull request with those changes because...
Well, I was hoping for someone to catch on with the extern(C) = nothrow
idea. Maybe this reallyy belongs in DMD!
On 4/9/14, 9:49 PM, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On 2014-04-10 00:01, Brad Roberts wrote:
And you aren't submitting a pull request with those changes because...
Well, I was hoping for someone to catch on with the extern(C) = nothrow idea.
Maybe this reallyy
belongs in DMD!
It shouldn't, because it'
Am Wed, 09 Apr 2014 22:19:30 -0700
schrieb Brad Roberts :
> On 4/9/14, 9:49 PM, Etienne Cimon wrote:
> > On 2014-04-10 00:01, Brad Roberts wrote:
> >> And you aren't submitting a pull request with those changes because...
> >
> > Well, I was hoping for someone to catch on with the extern(C) = noth
On 2014-04-10 2:51 AM, Marco Leise wrote:
> Isn't that paradox? Why is it legal to throw C++ exceptions
> into a language that can't possibly look at them? Does that
> mean every language which interfaces with C handles
> C++ exceptions in some way? E.g. JNI, Python, ...?
It's obviously blown ou
On 2014-04-10 1:19 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
So, not gonna happen. Please do consider spending a little time to open
pull requests for the ones that it's safe to be specified as nothrow.
Someone has to and the more people investing little bits of their time
the better. Waiting for someone else to
