I had a discussion a little while ago, regarding the validation
of predicates.
Basically, fearing that someone may write a predicate that
returned some weird user-defined type that wasn't bool-able, I
wrote:
//
void foo(Range, S)(Range r, S s)
if (isForwardRange!Range && is(typeof(r.f
On Monday, December 17, 2012 10:23:45 monarch_dodra wrote:
> Opinions? Just want to know how which direction to take my future
> developments.
How about we just require that they all return bool? I see no reason to
support anything else.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Monday, 17 December 2012 at 23:40:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, December 17, 2012 10:23:45 monarch_dodra wrote:
Opinions? Just want to know how which direction to take my
future
developments.
How about we just require that they all return bool? I see no
reason to
support any
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:23:18 monarch_dodra wrote:
> On Monday, 17 December 2012 at 23:40:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Monday, December 17, 2012 10:23:45 monarch_dodra wrote:
> >> Opinions? Just want to know how which direction to take my
> >> future
> >> developments.
> >
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 01:45:14 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:23:18 monarch_dodra wrote:
> > On Monday, 17 December 2012 at 23:40:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Monday, December 17, 2012 10:23:45 monarch_dodra wrote:
> > >> Opinions? Just want
On Tuesday, 18 December 2012 at 10:08:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
We're probably stuck with std.algorithm allowing implict
conversions to bool
due to the fact that a fair bit of it has accepted that for a
while, but
accepting anything which explictly casts to bool would be
tantamount to
t
