On Friday, 1 April 2016 at 17:44:40 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
On Friday, 1 April 2016 at 16:10:01 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Friday, 1 April 2016 at 14:37:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
(you'd need some sort of opApplyReverse function to go with
foreach_reverse, and no such thing exists).
Ac
On Friday, 1 April 2016 at 17:44:40 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
On Friday, 1 April 2016 at 16:10:01 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Friday, 1 April 2016 at 14:37:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
(you'd need some sort of opApplyReverse function to go with
foreach_reverse, and no such thing exists).
Ac
On Friday, 1 April 2016 at 16:10:01 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Friday, 1 April 2016 at 14:37:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
(you'd need some sort of opApplyReverse function to go with
foreach_reverse, and no such thing exists).
Actually, it exists and it works. It's just not implemented fo
On Friday, 1 April 2016 at 14:37:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
(you'd need some sort of opApplyReverse function to go with
foreach_reverse, and no such thing exists).
Actually, it exists and it works. It's just not implemented for
lockstep. I'm trying to clean up my Phobos repo so I can make
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 03:12:34 Sean Campbell via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Why doesn't reverse iteration of lockstep work? It does for zip.
> Is this intended or is it a bug?
Glancing over the code quickly, it looks like lockstep doesn't actually
generate a range but an object that defines opAp
On Thursday, 31 March 2016 at 03:12:34 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
Why doesn't reverse iteration of lockstep work? It does for
zip. Is this intended or is it a bug?
Please file an enhancement request at issues.dlang.org
On Thursday, 31 March 2016 at 03:12:34 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
Why doesn't reverse iteration of lockstep work? It does for
zip. Is this intended or is it a bug?
Lockstep is actually not a range. It overloads the opApply[1]
operator to support foreach. To support foreach_reverse, it would
al
Why doesn't reverse iteration of lockstep work? It does for zip.
Is this intended or is it a bug?
