It appears that gdmd (and to have that, gdc) is present in the 4.6 GCC
distribution on Debian but not yet in the 4.7. Is this planned or has
there been a problem somewhere?
Thanks.
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t
Iain,
gdmd was in gdc-4.6 but as far as I can tell it is not in gdc-4.9.1. Is
gdmd an ex-thing? In a sense I hope so as it required the environment
variable $HOME to be set and this is a problem for SCons testing.
Basically we have failing tests on gdc-4.6 based machines but not on
gdc-4.9.1
Le 09/05/2012 15:50, Russel Winder a écrit :
It appears that gdmd (and to have that, gdc) is present in the 4.6 GCC
distribution on Debian but not yet in the 4.7. Is this planned or has
there been a problem somewhere?
Thanks.
This package is outrageously outdated. I'm not sure it is p
On 09/05/12 16:07, deadalnix wrote:
This package is outrageously outdated. I'm not sure it is planed, but I'm sure
we should do our own repos debian. I would work with debian, ubuntu and mint
which is a large user base.
AFAICS both Debian and Ubuntu have the latest gdc-4.6, no?
Iain Buclaw men
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:10:16PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 09/05/12 16:07, deadalnix wrote:
> >This package is outrageously outdated. I'm not sure it is planed, but
> >I'm sure we should do our own repos debian. I would work with debian,
> >ubuntu and mint which is a large user b
On 9 May 2012 16:56, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:10:16PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> On 09/05/12 16:07, deadalnix wrote:
>> >This package is outrageously outdated. I'm not sure it is planed, but
>> >I'm sure we should do our own repos debian. I would work with debia
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:58:40PM +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 9 May 2012 16:56, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:10:16PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> >> On 09/05/12 16:07, deadalnix wrote:
> >> >This package is outrageously outdated. I'm not sure it is planed,
> >> >
On 9 May 2012 17:35, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:58:40PM +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 9 May 2012 16:56, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:10:16PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> >> On 09/05/12 16:07, deadalnix wrote:
>> >> >This package is outrageous
On 09/05/12 18:42, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Not at all - infact, I've had Matthias informing me every step of the
way where GCC has got to (a gentle hint that I'm being chased to
update the build package).
If you need his details, I'd be happy to pass them onto you and give
you a rundown of how the 4.
On 5/9/12 11:42 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Not at all - infact, I've had Matthias informing me every step of the
way where GCC has got to (a gentle hint that I'm being chased to
update the build package).
If you need his details, I'd be happy to pass them onto you and give
you a rundown of how the 4
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 9 May 2012 17:35, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:58:40PM +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >> On 9 May 2012 16:56, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >> > I'm using Debian's gdc-4.6 (4.6.3-1). Is that the latest?
> >> >
> >>
> >> It's
On 10 May 2012 20:18, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 9 May 2012 17:35, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:58:40PM +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> >> On 9 May 2012 16:56, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> >> > I'm using Debian's gdc-4.6 (4.6.
On 30 Aug 2014 17:47, "Russel Winder" wrote:
>
> Iain,
>
> gdmd was in gdc-4.6 but as far as I can tell it is not in gdc-4.9.1. Is
> gdmd an ex-thing? In a sense I hope so as it required the environment
> variable $HOME to be set and this is a problem for SCons
Iain,
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 18:07 +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[…]
>
> Yes, gdmd is no longer integrated. Is now an external tool.
Thanks muchly for the very rapid answer.
OK so gdmd gone from gdc, but I don't see a gdmd package in Debian. Is
gdmd not packaged but just a downloa
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:47:47 +0100
Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Is gdmd an ex-thing?
it is now in it's own repository:
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDMD.git
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 30 Aug 2014 18:11, "Russel Winder" wrote:
>
> Iain,
>
> On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 18:07 +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> […]
> >
> > Yes, gdmd is no longer integrated. Is now an external tool.
>
> Thanks muchly for the very rapid answer.
>
> OK so gdmd
rgs.
and forked rdmd, then converted it to rgdc and made rgdc use my
"-fwrite-pragma-libs=" patch.
maybe i should write "gdmd" too, just for completeness sake. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 20:48 +0300, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
> maybe i should write "gdmd" too, just for completeness sake. ;-)
Two alternatives I think:
1. Rewrite it in something other than Perl, D or Python mayhap.
2. Let it pass away into history
er completed (I never saw a PR).
> funny thing is that i made the exact opposite: wrote "kdmd" which
> translates dmd args to gdc args.
>
That isn't the opposite. That's what gdmd does. Unless you mean translate
gdc args to dmd. :)
Iain.
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:20:04 +0100
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> That isn't the opposite. That's what gdmd does. Unless you mean
> translate gdc args to dmd. :)
sorry, i must sleep more. ;-)
sure, gdc->dmd conversion, to build my projects with dmd (i'm not u
On 30/08/14 21:34, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 20:48 +0300, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
maybe i should write "gdmd" too, just for completeness sake. ;-)
Two alternatives I think:
1. Rewrite it in something other than Perl, D or Python mayh
21 matches
Mail list logo
