Am 31.05.2013 19:21, schrieb Rob T:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 16:52:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, May 31, 2013 18:05:16 Rob T wrote:
I've seen this happen with 2.062, if you take out -noboundscheck
it may reduce the size significantly and compile a lot faster.
Makes no sense.
My
Am 31.05.2013 19:19, schrieb deadalnix:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 16:31:42 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 16:58:11 +0100, Craig Dillabaugh
cdill...@cg.scs.carleton.ca wrote:
Under 40 kilobytes! If you do the bare minimum you can get down to
about 1 KB, but at that point, you're
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 16:31:42 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
Do you really think that is such a big issue?
Not really an issue, no. But newcomers keep creating threads
like this one time and again and who knows how many have been
turned away without finding out the whys and wherefores.
R
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:33:48 UTC, khurshid wrote:
I just download dmd 2.063, and compile simple hello world
program:
// hello.d
import std.stdio;
int main()
{
writeln(hello world);
return 0;
}
with -O -release -inline -noboundscheck flags.
And size of result output file
I just download dmd 2.063, and compile simple hello world
program:
// hello.d
import std.stdio;
int main()
{
writeln(hello world);
return 0;
}
with -O -release -inline -noboundscheck flags.
And size of result output file 'hello' equal to 1004.1 Kbyte !!!
Why size is big?
I'm
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:33:48 UTC, khurshid wrote:
And size of result output file 'hello' equal to 1004.1 Kbyte
Whoa, that's up like several times from the last dmd release
you can get down to 600 kb or so by not using the flags. Strange,
combining all those flags increases the
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:33:46 +0100, khurshid
khurshid.normura...@gmail.com wrote:
I just download dmd 2.063, and compile simple hello world program:
// hello.d
import std.stdio;
int main()
{
writeln(hello world);
return 0;
}
with -O -release -inline -noboundscheck flags.
And
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:48:02 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
If you use printf instead of std.stdio, you'll save about 150
KB in the executable
import core.stdc.stdio;
void main() {
printf(hello\n);
}
$ dmd test2.d
$ ls -lh test2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 me users 287K 2013-05-31 10:40 test2
$
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:48:12 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
You will get a similar size (or greater) if you statically
link the stdc library.
That's not necessarily true because static linking only pulls
functions that are actually used by the program
even though I just tried gcc
On Fri, 31 May 2013 16:00:00 +0100, Adam D. Ruppe
destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:48:12 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
You will get a similar size (or greater) if you statically link the
stdc library.
That's not necessarily true because static linking only pulls
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:56:17 UTC, khurshid wrote:
i.e. 299 Kbyte.
yeah it varies a bit by computer and 32 bit vs 64 bit etc, but
same ballpark.
Why copyright 2012 not a 2013?
Walter probably just forgot to update the message.
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 15:03:58 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
It is a bit surprising isn't it.
Aye.
BTW if you want to get into really small, statically linked D
programs, you can do a custom druntime, no phobos, no C lib, with
just the code you want. I recently wrote about a toy I've been
Under 40 kilobytes! If you do the bare minimum you can get down
to about 1 KB, but at that point, you're actually writing in
mostly (inline) assembly rather than D. The code in the link
though supports a majority (though certainly not all) of D's
features.
Agreed 100%. But newcomers don't
I've seen this happen with 2.062, if you take out -noboundscheck
it may reduce the size significantly and compile a lot faster.
Makes no sense.
--rt
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 15:58:12 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
Do you really think that is such a big issue? I can't remember
the last time I looked at the size of an executable I generated.
There's three cases where I sometimes care:
1) if I build the program on my computer, then push it
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:56:17 UTC, khurshid wrote:
[snip]
Even, when I type dmd -v :
DMD32 D Compiler v2.063
Copyright (c) 1999-2012 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright
Documentation: http://dlang.org/
-
Why copyright 2012 not a 2013?
On Fri, 31 May 2013 16:58:11 +0100, Craig Dillabaugh
cdill...@cg.scs.carleton.ca wrote:
Under 40 kilobytes! If you do the bare minimum you can get down to
about 1 KB, but at that point, you're actually writing in mostly
(inline) assembly rather than D. The code in the link though
On 05/31/2013 06:34 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:56:17 UTC, khurshid wrote:
Why copyright 2012 not a 2013?
Fixed in git.
Is this not something where some clever CTFE could be used to swipe the date of
build and insert the correct year? :-P
On Friday, May 31, 2013 18:05:16 Rob T wrote:
I've seen this happen with 2.062, if you take out -noboundscheck
it may reduce the size significantly and compile a lot faster.
Makes no sense.
My first guess would be that more ends up being inlined with -noboundscheck due
to the differences in
On 5/31/13 12:48 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 05/31/2013 06:34 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:56:17 UTC, khurshid wrote:
Why copyright 2012 not a 2013?
Fixed in git.
Is this not something where some clever CTFE could be used to swipe the date of
build and
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 16:31:42 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 16:58:11 +0100, Craig Dillabaugh
cdill...@cg.scs.carleton.ca wrote:
Under 40 kilobytes! If you do the bare minimum you can get
down to about 1 KB, but at that point, you're actually
writing in mostly (inline)
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 16:52:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, May 31, 2013 18:05:16 Rob T wrote:
I've seen this happen with 2.062, if you take out
-noboundscheck
it may reduce the size significantly and compile a lot faster.
Makes no sense.
My first guess would be that more ends
Am Fri, 31 May 2013 17:58:11 +0200
schrieb Craig Dillabaugh cdill...@cg.scs.carleton.ca:
Do you really think that is such a big issue? I can't remember
the last time I looked at the size of an executable I generated.
When I am trying to learn a new language it is really not
something I think
Am Fri, 31 May 2013 13:14:48 -0400
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
On 5/31/13 12:48 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 05/31/2013 06:34 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 14:56:17 UTC, khurshid wrote:
Why copyright 2012 not a 2013?
Fixed
24 matches
Mail list logo
