Walter Bright, el 10 de febrero a las 11:33 me escribiste:
> retard wrote:
> >Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:49:31 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> >
> >>D has moved a lot towards supplying by default a lot of what Coverity
> >>claims to do. By making such an expensive tool irrelevant for D, we can
> >>make D mu
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
This supposedly "safe" program under Mac OS X 10.6 doesn't give any error
neither at compile time nor at runtime, yet it isn't memory-safe at all as
it corrupts some part of the memory space.
@safe is in its infancy, and I expect there to be some gaps. We'll get
them
Walter Bright, el 10 de febrero a las 14:28 me escribiste:
> Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >This supposedly "safe" program under Mac OS X 10.6 doesn't give any error
> >neither at compile time nor at runtime, yet it isn't memory-safe at all as
> >it corrupts some part of the memory space.
>
> @safe i
