There were some discussions about adding namespace support with something
like extern(C++, namespace) IIRC. Don't know the result though.
Then there's this small patch
(http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4620) which allows very
interesting stuff, even simple templates. It's rotti
On 1/8/2012 7:54 PM, Trass3r wrote:
There were some discussions about adding namespace support with something like
extern(C++, namespace) IIRC. Don't know the result though.
Then there's this small patch
(http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4620) which allows very
interesting stuff, ev
How would this work exactly? Especially on Windows, libraries tend to
not be compatible with each other. Will a C++ library be required to be
compiled and linked with a certain toolset?
On 01/09/2012 03:16 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/8/2012 7:54 PM, Trass3r wrote:
There were some discussion
Le 09/01/2012 04:54, Trass3r a écrit :
There were some discussions about adding namespace support with
something like extern(C++, namespace) IIRC. Don't know the result though.
Then there's this small patch
(http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4620) which allows very
interesting stuff,
On 1/9/2012 1:25 AM, Zachary Lund wrote:
How would this work exactly? Especially on Windows, libraries tend to not be
compatible with each other. Will a C++ library be required to be compiled and
linked with a certain toolset?
Yes, as it is already.
Am 09.01.2012, 04:54 Uhr, schrieb Trass3r :
There were some discussions about adding namespace support with
something like extern(C++, namespace) IIRC. Don't know the result though.
Then there's this small patch
(http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4620) which allows very
intere
There were some discussions about adding namespace support with
something like extern(C++, namespace) IIRC. Don't know the result though.
Hmm another difficulty is how to switch between mangling schemes.
Then there's this small patch
(http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4620) which allows very
interesting stuff, even simple templates. It's rotting.
Wanna do a pull request for it?
Just wanted to point at it.
I'd like to have some discussion. See Martin Nowak's post for example.
In the
On 01/09/2012 06:36 AM, Trass3r wrote:
There were some discussions about adding namespace support with
something like extern(C++, namespace) IIRC. Don't know the result though.
Hmm another difficulty is how to switch between mangling schemes.
Given Walter's comment, I don't think they plan to
On 2012-01-09 12:36:35 +, Trass3r said:
There were some discussions about adding namespace support with
something like extern(C++, namespace) IIRC. Don't know the result
though.
Hmm another difficulty is how to switch between mangling schemes.
One thing that could be done is instead o
On Monday, 9 January 2012 at 18:04:58 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
Hmm another difficulty is how to switch between mangling
schemes.
One thing that could be done is instead of the namespace
argument, have a mangled name argument. Then use CTFE to build
the mangled name (if you want to).
This w
Le 09/01/2012 19:19, Trass3r a écrit :
On Monday, 9 January 2012 at 18:04:58 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
Hmm another difficulty is how to switch between mangling schemes.
One thing that could be done is instead of the namespace argument,
have a mangled name argument. Then use CTFE to build the m
On 01/10/2012 10:28 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 09/01/2012 19:19, Trass3r a écrit :
On Monday, 9 January 2012 at 18:04:58 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
Hmm another difficulty is how to switch between mangling schemes.
One thing that could be done is instead of the namespace argument,
have a mangled n
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:28:54 +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 09/01/2012 19:19, Trass3r a écrit :
On Monday, 9 January 2012 at 18:04:58 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
Hmm another difficulty is how to switch between mangling schemes.
One thing that could be done is instead of the namespace argument,
ha
On 2012-01-10 09:28:54 +, deadalnix said:
Le 09/01/2012 19:19, Trass3r a écrit :
On Monday, 9 January 2012 at 18:04:58 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
Hmm another difficulty is how to switch between mangling schemes.
One thing that could be done is instead of the namespace argument,
have a ma
On Tuesday, 10 January 2012 at 12:09:14 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
Another idea which would be much less verbose:
extern(C++, gccmangle)
void foo();
Here, gccmangle is a CTFE-capable function that'd be called
like this:
gccmangle("foo");
So if you need a namespace arg
On Tuesday, 10 January 2012 at 09:27:03 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Le 09/01/2012 19:19, Trass3r a écrit :
On Monday, 9 January 2012 at 18:04:58 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
Or maybe it should be a pragma instead.
Interesting idea. But how to do it properly?
A namespace or a class may have lots of fun
17 matches
Mail list logo
