Hi,
I just realized something: If the delete keyword is being removed because it's
dangerous, and if the scope storage class is being removed because of the same
dangling reference problem, how come
int[] global_var;
void foo(int[] args...) { global_var = args; }
isn't considered to be
On 01/31/2011 11:10 AM, %u wrote:
Hi,
I just realized something: If the delete keyword is being removed because it's
dangerous, and if the scope storage class is being removed because of the same
dangling reference problem, how come
int[] global_var;
void foo(int[] args...) {
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:15:18 -0500, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/31/2011 11:10 AM, %u wrote:
Hi,
I just realized something: If the delete keyword is being removed
because it's
dangerous, and if the scope storage class is being removed because of
the same
dangling reference