std.experimental repo

2017-03-25 Thread Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
I don't use dub and I doubt I ever will. As a ndslice user, I long dreaded this day: 2.074.0: "std.experimental.ndslice has been removed" Well, I will deal with it, I was just thinking what could we do better for the future? What if experimental was in a sub repo? Then everyone who gets a mo

Re: std.experimental repo

2017-03-25 Thread XavierAP via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 25 March 2017 at 09:42:07 UTC, Daniel N wrote: As a ndslice user, I long dreaded this day: 2.074.0: "std.experimental.ndslice has been removed" Are you aware that ndslice is available at https://github.com/libmir/mir-algorithm right? I believe the reason std.experimental.ndslic

Re: std.experimental repo

2017-03-25 Thread Seb via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 25 March 2017 at 10:28:36 UTC, XavierAP wrote: On Saturday, 25 March 2017 at 09:42:07 UTC, Daniel N wrote: As a ndslice user, I long dreaded this day: 2.074.0: "std.experimental.ndslice has been removed" Are you aware that ndslice is available at https://github.com/libmir/mir-al

Re: std.experimental repo

2017-03-25 Thread rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
On 25/03/2017 3:20 PM, Seb wrote: On Saturday, 25 March 2017 at 10:28:36 UTC, XavierAP wrote: On Saturday, 25 March 2017 at 09:42:07 UTC, Daniel N wrote: As a ndslice user, I long dreaded this day: 2.074.0: "std.experimental.ndslice has been removed" Are you aware that ndslice is available a

Re: std.experimental repo

2017-03-25 Thread XavierAP via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 25 March 2017 at 14:20:53 UTC, Seb wrote: So in short: as long as a library is in active development, it's its death to put it into the standard library. That could be different for std.experimental.*? Or does that work only when development comes directly from the Foundation? S

Re: std.experimental repo

2017-03-25 Thread XavierAP via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 25 March 2017 at 14:20:53 UTC, Seb wrote: https://forum.dlang.org/post/phexetutyelrssyru...@forum.dlang.org) This has struck me from Ilya's post, as a problem that we had at my previous job: code base of old platform too monolithic, not modular enough; which in that case could t

Re: std.experimental repo

2017-03-25 Thread Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 25 March 2017 at 16:50:18 UTC, XavierAP wrote: On Saturday, 25 March 2017 at 14:20:53 UTC, Seb wrote: So in short: as long as a library is in active development, it's its death to put it into the standard library. That could be different for std.experimental.*? Or does that wor