https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8142
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8142
Summary: std.functional.curry isn't flexible enough
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:19:47 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 06/24/2010 07:06 PM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
Hi folks,
The template std.functional.curry(alias fun, alias arg) claims to
curry fun by tying its first argument to a particular value.
That is not currying; it is partial
On 06/25/2010 08:39 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:19:47 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 06/24/2010 07:06 PM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
Hi folks,
The template std.functional.curry(alias fun, alias arg) claims to
curry fun by tying its first argument to a particular value.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 16:36, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 06/25/2010 08:39 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
Thank you.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4391
Great. I'm hoping for a patch that fixes the problem, but it's good to have
the report we
Hi folks,
The template std.functional.curry(alias fun, alias arg) claims to
curry fun by tying its first argument to a particular value.
That is not currying; it is partial application. In particular, it is a
kind of partial application called a left section, because the argument
provided is
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Graham Fawcett fawc...@uwindsor.ca wrote:
Hi folks,
The template std.functional.curry(alias fun, alias arg) claims to
curry fun by tying its first argument to a particular value.
That is not currying; it is partial application. In particular, it is a
kind of
Graham Fawcett:
If this were a real curry, you would write it like this:
int fun(int a, int b) { return a + b; }
assert(curry!(fun)(5)(6) == 11);
Right. Better to change the name.
Regarding std.functional, are the HOF adjoin(), compose() and pipe() useful? I
don't think I'll use compose() or
On 06/24/2010 07:06 PM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
Hi folks,
The template std.functional.curry(alias fun, alias arg) claims to
curry fun by tying its first argument to a particular value.
That is not currying; it is partial application.
[...]
Confusing curring and partial application is a very
On 06/24/2010 07:37 PM, bearophile wrote:
Graham Fawcett:
If this were a real curry, you would write it like this: int
fun(int a, int b) { return a + b; } assert(curry!(fun)(5)(6) ==
11);
Right. Better to change the name.
I think it would be even better to redefine curry to do actual
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I think it would be even better to redefine curry to do actual currying.
Right.
I'm finding them quite useful, particularly in conjunction with e.g. map.
Oh, OK. Then let's keep them :-)
What do you think about the apply?
Bye,
bearophile
11 matches
Mail list logo
