https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4046
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|D1 D2 |D2
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1231
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D2
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1231
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Phobos |DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1116
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1116
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
---
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:06:04 UTC, Manu wrote:
I just installed dmd 2.60 in linux, and it seems std.intrinsic
isn't
there... is this my fault somehow, or has it been removed?
I need the bsr() intrinsic which (used to?) live there.
import core.bitop;
On 3 October 2012 00:17, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 at 21:06:04 UTC, Manu wrote:
I just installed dmd 2.60 in linux, and it seems std.intrinsic isn't
there... is this my fault somehow, or has it been removed?
I need the bsr() intrinsic which (used
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5703
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4046
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4046
--- Comment #1 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-09-22 06:27:33 PDT ---
I'm not sure why the btXX functions (bt, btc, btr, etc) exist at all.
Although they are a single instruction, they are MUCH slower than the
equivalent code using shifts
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4046
Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5703
Summary: std.intrinsic. and core.bitop.bsf, bsr and bswap
should be CTFE-able
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5703
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5703
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5703
--- Comment #2 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-03-05 13:34:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
These functions should be rewritten in D like bitswap and popcnt.
I think they aren't functions.
They appear to be
/dmd/src/phobos/std/path.d)
importstd.c.linux.linux (/opt/dmd/src/phobos/std/c/linux/linux.d)
importstd.c.linux.linuxextern
(/opt/dmd/src/phobos/std/c/linux/linuxextern.d)
importstd.c.linux.pthread (/opt/dmd/src/phobos/std/c/linux/pthread.d)
importstd.intrinsic (/opt/dmd/src
Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
Alright my first post is almost unreadable so restarting with the http
version...
Hope it's going to be better.
Why are you using version 2.008??? It was one of the first 'proof of
concept' alpha test versions. It wasn't intended for serious use. Any
version prior
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
Alright my first post is almost unreadable so restarting with the http
version...
Hope it's going to be better.
Why are you using version 2.008??? It was one of the first 'proof of
concept' alpha test
On Saturday 30 October 2010 07:33:05 Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
Alright my first post is almost unreadable so restarting with the http
version...
Hope it's going to be better.
Why are you using
Thx a lot Jonathan for all the good news.
I thought only the rpms were actually containing the binaries and the zip only
a source archive for people to build
locally. As you might know rpms are not really the Gentoo's philosophy so I
wanted to stick to Gentoo's portage. I
just gave a try to the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4619
--- Comment #4 from Rod�ric Vicaire ing...@libertysurf.fr 2010-08-13 04:35:20
PDT ---
Ok I did create a fresh project and it does work too, I still get that problem
in the old one, I'm not sure whether it's worth investigating...
Can anyone
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4619
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
;
import std.intrinsic;
void main( char[][] args )
{
int res = bsr( 2 );
}
Error message:
OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.2
Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2009 All rights reserved.
http://www.digitalmars.com/ctg/optlink.html
Debug\FlExtEngine.obj(FlExtEngine)
Error 42: Symbol Undefined
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4619
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4619
Summary: Can't link with std.intrinsic function(s)
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4619
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4046
Summary: [CTFE] std.intrinsic
Product: D
Version: future
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority
Right at the beginning of the file there is:
module std.intrinsic;
nothrow:
Nevertheless some functions are
pure nothrow int bsf(uint v);
some not:
int btc(uint *p, uint bitnum);
So either those nothrows are obsolete or the nothrow: is a mistake, right?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1116
--- Comment #2 from k...@redstar.de 2009-10-11 07:14:55 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=472)
Implementation of rol() and ror() intrinsics.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1116
k...@redstar.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@redstar.de
--- Comment #3 from
30 matches
Mail list logo
