Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
>
> It's probably common courtesy that should be preserved. I just committed
> the fix prompted by Lutger (thanks).
>
> Andrei
Thanks Andrei. When the next version is released I'll remove the temporary
findRex() function from my current code.
Steve ;=)
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:24:32 -0500, Steve Teale
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
I'm guessing you are referring to php's pcre vs posix regex? I think
posix is marked as deprecated...
Steve,
No. I just meant that the library that comes with PHP seems happy to
provide different ways
Steve Teale:
> The current system, where modules of the library can get arbitrarily
> deprecated and at some point removed because they are unfashionable, is very
> unfriendly.
We are in the initial phase of Phobos develpment, so frequent large changes are
expected. Surely one year from now Ph
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:24:02 -0800
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:30:03 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> > The standard library should not have something to please everyone. If
> > there is 5 different styles to do the same thing, it will be a failure.
>
> Agreed. Ideal
On 11/16/10 10:46 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:13 -0500, Steve Teale
wrote:
Andrei,
Maybe it is time that the structure of the standard library became more
generalized. At the moment we have std... and core...
Perhaps we need another branch
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:30:03 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> The standard library should not have something to please everyone. If
> there is 5 different styles to do the same thing, it will be a failure.
Agreed. Ideally, the standard library would be very uniform in approach. That
makes
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
>>
> I'm guessing you are referring to php's pcre vs posix regex? I think
> posix is marked as deprecated...
>
Steve,
No. I just meant that the library that comes with PHP seems happy to provide
different ways of doing the same thing, as in for example, CURL, DOM
On 11/16/10 10:16 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
I am sorry for the inadvertent change, it wasn't meant to change
semantics of existing code. I'm not sure whether one of my unrelated
64-bit changes messed things up. You may want to file a bug report.
There are a number of g
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:46:48 -0500, Steve Teale
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:13 -0500, Steve Teale
wrote:
>
> Andrei,
>
> Maybe it is time that the structure of the standard library became
more
> generalized. At the moment we have std... and core...
>
> P
On 11/16/2010 01:30 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:13 -0500, Steve Teale
wrote:
Andrei,
Maybe it is time that the structure of the standard library became
more generalized. At the moment we have std... and core...
Perhaps we need another branch in the hierarchy, li
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:13 -0500, Steve Teale
> wrote:
> >
> > Andrei,
> >
> > Maybe it is time that the structure of the standard library became more
> > generalized. At the moment we have std... and core...
> >
> > Perhaps we need another branch in the hierar
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:16:13 -0500, Steve Teale
wrote:
Andrei,
Maybe it is time that the structure of the standard library became more
generalized. At the moment we have std... and core...
Perhaps we need another branch in the hierarchy, like ranges... Then
there could be a std.range mo
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
>
> I am sorry for the inadvertent change, it wasn't meant to change
> semantics of existing code. I'm not sure whether one of my unrelated
> 64-bit changes messed things up. You may want to file a bug report.
>
> There are a number of good reasons for which I was co
Steve Teale wrote:
> KennyTM~ Wrote:
>
>> On Nov 15, 10 14:58, Steve Teale wrote:
>> > Some time ago in phobos2, the following:
>> >
>> > RegExp wsr = RegExp("(\\s+)");
>> > int p = wsr.find("");
>> > writefln("%s|%s|%s %d",wsr.pre(), wsr.match(1), wsr.post(), p);
>> >
>> > would pri
On 11/15/10 7:55 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
KennyTM~ Wrote:
On Nov 15, 10 14:58, Steve Teale wrote:
Some time ago in phobos2, the following:
RegExp wsr = RegExp("(\\s+)");
int p = wsr.find("");
writefln("%s|%s|%s %d",wsr.pre(), wsr.match(1), wsr.post(), p);
would print:
7
No
Steve Teale Wrote:
> I guess std.regexp is still there because not all of us necessarily want to
> iterate a range to simply find out the position of the first whitespace in a
> string.
I'm pretty sure it is still there for the same reason many are, trying to
figure out when it should be remov
KennyTM~ Wrote:
> On Nov 15, 10 14:58, Steve Teale wrote:
> > Some time ago in phobos2, the following:
> >
> > RegExp wsr = RegExp("(\\s+)");
> > int p = wsr.find("");
> > writefln("%s|%s|%s %d",wsr.pre(), wsr.match(1), wsr.post(), p);
> >
> > would print:
> >
> > 7
> >
> > Now it p
On Nov 15, 10 14:58, Steve Teale wrote:
Some time ago in phobos2, the following:
RegExp wsr = RegExp("(\\s+)");
int p = wsr.find("");
writefln("%s|%s|%s %d",wsr.pre(), wsr.match(1), wsr.post(), p);
would print:
7
Now it prints
1
The new return value is pretty useless, equiv
18 matches
Mail list logo
