On 01/10/2010 12:54, bearophile wrote:
Bruno Medeiros:
From my understanding, Scala is a "scalable language" in the sense
that it easy to add new language features, or something similar to that.
I see. You may be right.
But I'm missing your point here, what does Ada have to do with this?
Bruno Medeiros:
>[About ADA] That "begin" "end " syntax is awful. I already
>think just "begin" "end" syntax is bad, but also having to repeat the name of
>block/function/procedure/loop at the "end", that's awful.<
If you take a look at my dlibs1, probably more than 60_000 lines of D1 code,
yo
On 06/10/2010 22:48, bearophile wrote:
Bruno Medeiros:
[About ADA] That "begin" "end" syntax is awful. I already think just "begin"
"end" syntax is bad, but also having to repeat the name of block/function/procedure/loop at the "end", that's
awful.<
If you take a look at my dlibs1, probably
Bruno Medeiros:
> I'm not an expert on high-reliability/critical systems, but I had the
> impression that the majority of it was written in C (even if with
> restricting code guidelines). Or that at least, much more critical
> software is written in C than in Ada. Is that not the case?
MISRA C
