Can this be made a compiler warning?
struct Foo
{
int i;
}
void main()
{
Foo foo;
with (foo)
{
i = 42;
int i;
i = 24;
}
}
I'm hesitant to file a bug because it'll just be immediately
closed with a link to
https://dlang.org/spec/statement.html#WithS
On Sunday, July 22, 2018 12:13:43 Anonymouse via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Can this be made a compiler warning?
>
> struct Foo
> {
> int i;
> }
>
> void main()
> {
> Foo foo;
>
> with (foo)
> {
> i = 42;
> int i;
> i = 24;
> }
> }
>
> I'm hesitant to
On Sunday, 22 July 2018 at 12:13:43 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
Can this be made a compiler warning?
struct Foo
{
int i;
}
void main()
{
Foo foo;
with (foo)
{
i = 42;
int i;
i = 24;
}
}
I'm hesitant to file a bug because it'll just be immediately
closed
On Sunday, 22 July 2018 at 14:05:45 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 22, 2018 12:13:43 Anonymouse via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Can this be made a compiler warning?
struct Foo
{
int i;
}
void main()
{
Foo foo;
with (foo)
{
i = 42;
int i;
i
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 12:01:19 UTC, Jim Balter wrote:
Do you have an actual case where it was a problem, as opposed
to a contrived example with semantically empty identifiers? I
recently saw another comment objecting to `with` altogether as
being obfuscating because you can't tell which sy
On Sunday, 22 July 2018 at 12:13:43 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
I'm hesitant to file a bug because it'll just be immediately
closed with a link to
https://dlang.org/spec/statement.html#WithStatement. I
understand that's how it works, but it's weird and weak to
human mistakes.
IMO the only reasona
On 7/22/18 8:13 AM, Anonymouse wrote:
Can this be made a compiler warning?
struct Foo
{
int i;
}
void main()
{
Foo foo;
with (foo)
{
i = 42;
int i;
i = 24;
}
}
I'm hesitant to file a bug because it'll just be immediately closed with
a link
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 17:26:16 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/22/18 8:13 AM, Anonymouse wrote:
Can this be made a compiler warning?
struct Foo
{
int i;
}
void main()
{
Foo foo;
with (foo)
{
i = 42;
int i;
i = 24;
}
}
I'm hesitan
