Re: wxD bindings

2012-07-07 Thread Gour
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 00:49:37 +0200 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote: I'll see about that. I'm not sure if doxygen works on C libraries, if it does then it's doable. Since now I support POD types there's nothing from stopping the generator to work on C libraries. If/when you

Re: wxD bindings

2012-06-07 Thread Gour
On Mon, 28 May 2012 19:55:09 +0200 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Andrej, thank you very much for your response... I was busy doing another rewrite of my codebase since it was getting rather large and too specific for wxwidgets (lots and lots of doxygen workarounds).

Re: wxD bindings

2012-06-07 Thread Andrej Mitrovic
On 6/7/12, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Will it be usable for C libs as well? I'll see about that. I'm not sure if doxygen works on C libraries, if it does then it's doable. Since now I support POD types there's nothing from stopping the generator to work on C libraries. gccxml works for C++

Re: wxD bindings

2012-05-28 Thread Andrej Mitrovic
On 5/21/12, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: just wonder if there are any news in regard to wxD bindings project? I was busy doing another rewrite of my codebase since it was getting rather large and too specific for wxwidgets (lots and lots of doxygen workarounds). Doxygen files for handwritten

Re: wxD bindings

2012-05-20 Thread Gour
it a run. just wonder if there are any news in regard to wxD bindings project? Sincerely, Gour -- Even if you are considered to be the most sinful of all sinners, when you are situated in the boat of transcendental knowledge you will be able to cross over the ocean of miseries. http

wxD bindings (was Re: automated C++ binding generation.. Booost D, NO , Not us. SIMD is more important.)

2012-02-12 Thread Gour
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:45:06 +0100 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote: 542 classes are successfully generated (and buildable). 132+ are left to go. Great! I've ran into a few issues where the interface files (from which the xml is built) are not in sync with the code. So there

Re: wxD bindings (was Re: automated C++ binding generation.. Booost D, NO , Not us. SIMD is more important.)

2012-02-12 Thread Andrej Mitrovic
On 2/12/12, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: I saw your messages in wx-dev and wonder what will be the way to keep those files in sync or, at least, detect there are inconsistencies? They have a tool called ifacecheck which compares the xml files generated by doxygen to the ones generated by using