On 02/01/2013 04:55 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
There's also the problem of porting the runtime, if not already done.
Aren't the Xeon Phi chips designed to be x86-compatible? The runtime could
surely be optimized for them, but wouldn't necessarily need to be ported per se.
On 2013-02-02 15:05, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Aren't the Xeon Phi chips designed to be x86-compatible? The runtime
could surely be optimized for them, but wouldn't necessarily need to be
ported per se.
I have no idea what Xeon Phi is. I assumed it was non-x86 since the
question
Am 02.02.2013 17:51, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2013-02-02 15:05, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Aren't the Xeon Phi chips designed to be x86-compatible? The runtime
could surely be optimized for them, but wouldn't necessarily need to be
ported per se.
I have no idea what Xeon Phi is. I
I'm a newbie to D. I was wondering if D can be compiled to run on
the Xeon Phi co-processor.
On Friday, 1 February 2013 at 15:18:28 UTC, Roy Obena wrote:
I'm a newbie to D. I was wondering if D can be compiled to run
on the Xeon Phi co-processor.
Apparently, GCC should have support for Xeon Phi by now:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTEyMjY . This
means that GDC
On 2013-02-01 16:27, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Apparently, GCC should have support for Xeon Phi by now:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTEyMjY . This means
that GDC (http://gdcproject.org/) should be able to build Xeon Phi
friendly executables. I am just guessing here. Do you have
