On Friday, August 24, 2018 7:46:57 AM MDT Mike Franklin via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 13:21:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > I think that you're crazy.
>
> No, I just see more potential in D than you do.
To be clear, I'm not calling you crazy in general. I'm calling t
On Friday, August 24, 2018 4:44:31 PM MDT Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> You're underestimating the benefits. It's not just to be
> eventually slightly faster. It makes @safe versions possible,
> this in turn avoids a lot of @trusted calls, so reduces review
> effort. It allow
On Friday, August 24, 2018 6:54:38 PM MDT Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 19:26:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> > On 8/24/2018 6:04 AM, Chris wrote:
> >> For about a year I've had the feeling that D is moving too
> >> fast and going nowhere at the same time. D has to s
On Friday, August 24, 2018 7:03:37 PM MDT Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> > What uses does this actually have, I only see one example from
> > the article and it is an oversimplistic example that
> > effectively translates to either phobos being used or not being
> > used. All the extra
On Saturday, August 25, 2018 2:02:51 AM MDT Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-
d wrote:
> So assuming we're on the same page, you mentioned that the `from`
> template is too verbose. I can see this point. To measure this I
> consider the least verbose syntax for achieving the semantics of
> the `fro
On Saturday, August 25, 2018 3:30:27 AM MDT Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> from is not the entire problem, but IMHO, it's definitely the straw that
> breaks the camel's back. It's taking all of this specificity way too far.
> I don't want to have
On Saturday, August 25, 2018 7:33:47 AM MDT Shachar Shemesh via Digitalmars-
d wrote:
> On 25/08/18 10:56, Walter Bright wrote:
> > On 8/24/2018 6:34 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >> No, unlike what I suggest, that doesn't work without carefully
> >> reviewing every single place you put it to see wh
On Sunday, August 26, 2018 5:39:32 PM MDT Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> ARC? What ever happened to the opAddRef/opDecRef proposal? Was it
> rejected? Is it canned, or is it just back on the bench? (GC is
> absolutely off the table for my project, I have no influence on this)
I don't know what
On Sunday, August 26, 2018 7:11:30 PM MDT Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 18:09, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
>
> wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 26, 2018 5:39:32 PM MDT Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > > ARC? What ever happened to the opAddRe
On Sunday, August 26, 2018 5:12:10 PM MDT FeepingCreature via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Sunday, 26 August 2018 at 22:44:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> > On 8/26/2018 8:43 AM, Chris wrote:
> >> I wanted to get rid of autodecode and I even offered to test
> >> it on my string heavy code to see what
On Sunday, August 26, 2018 7:25:12 PM MDT Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> > Can I just throw in here that I like autodecoding and I think
> > it's good?
> > If you want ranges that iterate over bytes, then just use
> > arrays of bytes. If you want Latin1 text, use Latin1 strings.
> > If
On Saturday, August 25, 2018 2:16:16 PM MDT Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 8/25/2018 7:37 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > In general, any place where D was
> > designed around the idea that something would _always_ be there (e.g.
> > init values and default initialization) but we've t
On Tuesday, August 28, 2018 11:31:40 PM MDT Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 8/28/2018 6:39 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > Template emission strategy is a mess, we're better off just
> > instantiating all templates in all compilation units, and let the
> > compiler decide whatever to discar
On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 2:37:17 AM MDT Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 8/28/2018 11:52 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Would it make sense then to change it to work more like what you and
> > Martin were thinking of doing?
>
> Yes, it would. But it would be a non-trivial effort t
On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 10:38:48 AM MDT Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 08/22/2018 10:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> > That reminds me, what happened to our conversation with Ali Çehreli
> > about splitting general [newsgroup/forum] into Technical and less
> > technical?
> Even I
On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 11:15:15 AM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:58:16PM +0200, Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> > On 28.08.2018 19:02, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 08:18:57AM +, Eugene Wissner via
> > > Digitalmars-d wrote
On Friday, August 31, 2018 4:23:09 PM MDT Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 8/31/2018 1:42 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> > Some countries do have engineering certifications and professional
> > permits for software engineering, but its still a minority.
>
> That won't fix anything, because th
On Friday, August 31, 2018 5:20:08 PM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> A consequence of this disconnect is that the incentives are set up all
> wrong. Professors are paid to publish research papers, not to teach
> students. Teaching is often viewed as an undesired additional burden
> yo
On Saturday, September 1, 2018 1:59:27 AM MDT Walter Bright via Digitalmars-
d wrote:
> On 8/31/2018 5:40 PM, tide wrote:
> > On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 22:42:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> >> On 8/31/2018 2:40 PM, tide wrote:
> >>> I don't think I've ever had a **game** hung up in a black screen
On Saturday, September 1, 2018 2:19:07 AM MDT Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 21:09:21 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >> Some countries do have engineering certifications and
> >> professional permits for software engineering, but its still a
> >> minority.
> >
> > [...]
On Saturday, September 1, 2018 6:46:38 AM MDT rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 12:21 AM, tide wrote:
> > On Saturday, 1 September 2018 at 05:53:12 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> >> On 01/09/2018 12:40 PM, tide wrote:
> >>> On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 22:42:39 UTC, Walter
On Saturday, September 1, 2018 6:37:13 AM MDT tide via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 1 September 2018 at 08:18:03 UTC, Walter Bright
>
> wrote:
> > On 8/31/2018 7:28 PM, tide wrote:
> >> I'm just wondering but how would you code an assert to ensure
> >> the variable for a title bar is the cor
On Saturday, September 1, 2018 8:31:36 AM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> This change may also address the current hackish implementation of
> subclass contracts (which involves catching Errors, an arguably
> dangerous thing to do), though I'm not 100% sure.
AFAIK, there's absolutely no
On Saturday, September 1, 2018 2:15:15 PM MDT Walter Bright via Digitalmars-
d wrote:
> https://blog.regehr.org/archives/1091
>
> As usual, John nails it in a particularly well-written essay.
>
> "ASSERT(expr)
> Asserts that an expression is true. The expression may or may not be
> evaluated. If th
On Saturday, September 1, 2018 9:18:17 PM MDT Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 08/31/2018 03:50 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> [From your comment in that thread]
>
> > fill up your system disk to near capacity, then try to run various
>
> apps and system utilities.
>
> I've ha
On Saturday, September 1, 2018 10:44:57 PM MDT Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 09/01/2018 01:51 AM, rikki cattermole wrote:
> > But in saying that, we had third year students starting out not
> > understanding how cli arguments work so...
>
> How I wish that sort of thing
On Sunday, September 2, 2018 7:21:05 AM MDT bauss via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Is there a reason why you cannot create a separate scope within a
> static foreach?
>
> The below will not compile:
>
> ```
> enum a = ["a" : "a", "b" : "b", "c" : "c"];
>
> static foreach (k,v; a)
> {
> {
>
On Sunday, September 2, 2018 1:52:34 PM MDT John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> > If the compiler can add @safe optimizations based on
> > assertions, then that's fine with me (though I know that some
> > others don't agree), but they have to be @safe even when the
> > assertion would have fail
On Sunday, September 2, 2018 11:54:57 PM MDT Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 09/03/2018 12:46 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Anything less is unsafe, because being
> > in an invalid state means you cannot predict what the program will do
> > when you try to recover it. Your st
n Monday, September 3, 2018 12:39:17 AM MDT Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 04:43:30 UTC, bauss wrote:
> > On Sunday, 2 September 2018 at 20:01:08 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 2 September 2018 at 19:42:20 UTC, bauss wrote:
> >>> Woud b
On Monday, September 3, 2018 9:41:48 AM MDT Laurent Tréguier via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 15:23:12 UTC, Chris wrote:
> > On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 14:26:46 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 11:32:42 UTC, Chris wrote:
> >>> [...]
On Monday, September 3, 2018 11:15:03 AM MDT Laurent Tréguier via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> It just baffles me a bit to see the state of D in this
> department, when languages like Go or Rust (hooray for yet
> another comparison to Go and Rust) are a lot younger, but already
> have what looks like ve
On Monday, September 3, 2018 12:55:01 PM MDT Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 16:55:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > But if you're ever expecting IDE support to be a top priority
> > of many of the contributors, then you're going to be sorely
> > disappointed.
On Monday, September 3, 2018 12:26:57 PM MDT Chris via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> There is no real plan and
> only problems that someone deems interesting or challenging at a
> given moment are tackled. If they solve a problem for a lot of
> users, it's only a side effect. The advent of a D Foundation
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 5:56:54 AM MDT ShadoLight via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> We work full-time for employers which, in my case, employs
> thousands of engineers - and as a result engineering principles
> are applied to everything - including tools. So all SW dev teams
> here use standardized
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 2:45:53 PM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> Those who've learned LaTeX swear by it. Those who are learning LaTeX swear
> at it. -- Pete Bleackley
Well, that's a weirdly appropriate quote. The primary reason that I've done
as much with latex as I have is so t
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 7:18:17 PM MDT James Blachly via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 00:49:36 UTC, Everlast wrote:
> > I downloaded 3ddemo, extracted, built and I get these errors:
> ...
>
> > This is typical with most of my trials with D... something is
> > alwa
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 7:54:49 PM MDT Dylan Graham via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 00:49:36 UTC, Everlast wrote:
> > I downloaded 3ddemo, extracted, built and I get these errors:
> >
> > logger 2.66.0: building configuration "library"...
> > \dub\packages\logger
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 8:40:32 AM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On the contrary, many of the regular contributors here, don't give a
> lick about the forum software, as long as it's primarily backed by the
> newsgroup server. Many, including myself use the NG server, man
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 1:25:14 PM MDT Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 8/21/2018 7:18 AM, Seb wrote:
> >> some rely on stackoverflow, some have an active wiki
> >
> > There are a few good points to move D.learn to Stack Overflow and that's
> > actually one thing that we have talked
On Saturday, September 1, 2018 5:46:55 PM MDT Walter Bright via Digitalmars-
d wrote:
> On 9/1/2018 3:58 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > On Saturday, 1 September 2018 at 22:10:27 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> I've used StackOverflow. It's NOT a place for asking and answering
> >> questions.>
> > I
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 8:37:16 PM MDT Dylan Graham via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 02:10:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Sure, yeah, but if you're using a package that hasn't been
> maintained in 2-3 years you need to take whether it will work
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 2:30:25 AM MDT Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 9/4/2018 10:16 PM, Manu wrote:
> > I'm serious, you can have your cake, and potentially, I could have my
> > cake too, and everybody would be happy... nobody would be sad.
>
> If it is the same, I provided s
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 3:54:17 AM MDT Everlast via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 08:21:48 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 00:49:36 UTC, Everlast wrote:
> >> This attitude of "It's your problem" is going to kill D.
> >
> > Well, if you h
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 1:44:33 AM MDT Suliman via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 at 07:54:15 UTC, Suliman wrote:
> > Stat out of date... Plz update it.
>
> And once again plz
Just FYI, responding to a thread that's several months old is a good way for
a lot of folks to not
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 4:29:32 AM MDT Dechcaudron via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 19:50:27 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> > The only blocker is finding a good syntax.
>
> How does "static enum" sound?
Like it would be really, really confusing. Too many people already
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 5:19:04 AM MDT Dechcaudron via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 10:45:20 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Too many people already think that the point of static is to
> > just make something be done at compile time (which is actually
> >
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 6:35:59 AM MDT ShadoLight via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 22:38:08 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
>
> (Abscissa) wrote:
> > On 09/04/2018 04:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 5:56:54 AM MDT ShadoLight via
> >> Digital
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 7:03:26 AM MDT Nicholas Wilson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> This is a prime example of an industry blocker if ever there was.
> Yes there has been a lot of talking past each other, but surely
> you understand _what_ Manu is wanting even if you seem to think
> that yo
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 8:18:03 AM MDT SashaGreat via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 13:27:48 UTC, Steven
>
> Schveighoffer wrote:
> > 3ddemo has one commit. In February 2016. I think it would be an
> > amazing feat indeed if a project with one version builds for
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 9:05:29 AM MDT SashaGreat via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 14:45:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 8:18:03 AM MDT SashaGreat via
> > Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > ...
>
> Thanks for replying and I think I'
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 9:28:38 AM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:18:24AM -0600, Jonathan M Davis via
> Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
>
> > 3rd party libraries are usually the real problem if there is one. They
> > need to be maintai
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 4:30:15 AM MDT rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 05/09/2018 10:19 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 1:44:33 AM MDT Suliman via Digitalmars-d
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 at 07:54:15 UTC, Suliman wrote:
> >>> S
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 1:49:31 PM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 07:21:51PM +, kinke via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 04:03:19 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > Rather, we should deprecate classes, and make and exp
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 1:34:40 PM MDT 12345swordy via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 04:03:19 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
> > In my opinion, we shouldn't add a third option. Rather, we
> > should deprecate classes, and make and expand the capabilities
> > of structs
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 3:11:14 AM MDT Dechcaudron via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 11:39:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Conceptually, what Timon is talking about doing here is to add
> > an attribute to symbols declared within a static foreach where
> >
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 10:44:11 AM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 02:42:58PM +, Dukc via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 14:17:28 UTC, aliak wrote:
> > > // D
> > > auto a = "á";
> > > auto b = "á";
> > > auto c = "\u200B";
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 12:35:06 PM MDT Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> Ah, but would you actually pay for such a service to be set up?
>
> https://forum.dlang.org/thread/acxedxzzesxkyomrs...@forum.dlang.org
>
> It's all well and good to hope for such services, but they're
> unlikely to h
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 1:04:45 PM MDT aliak via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> D makes the code-point case default and hence that becomes the
> simplest to use. But unfortunately, the only thing I can think of
> that requires code point representations is when dealing
> specifically with unicode al
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 11:09:34 AM MDT SrMordred via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> > void foo(string s) {}
> >
> > foo("this");
> >
> > won't compile, since it won't make a String out of that
> > immutable(char)[] literal without an explicit initialization of
> > some sort.
>
> //cannot pass argu
On Friday, September 7, 2018 8:36:11 AM MDT 0xEAB via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 20:08:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 12:35:06 PM MDT Joakim via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >> Ah, but would you actually pay for such a service t
On Friday, September 7, 2018 10:35:29 AM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 09:24:13AM -0600, Jonathan M Davis via
> Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
> > What's somewhat more of an open question is how new compiler releases
> > should be handled. As
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 7:44:09 AM MDT Nicholas Wilson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 7 September 2018 at 19:15:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Honestly, I wouldn't rely on anything beyond dub build working
> > in a consistent manner across projects. As far as I can tell,
> >
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 7:28:53 AM MDT Nicholas Wilson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 16:50:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Again, this strongly suggests the idea I've mentioned a few
> > times now: *all* packages on code.dlang.org needs to be run
> > through a CI
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 6:35:32 AM MDT tide via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Dates won't help, if you have a comment with a date that states
> everything under it was modified at that date. What happens when
> there's a split of 3-4 lines between modifications? Just how many
> of these comments ar
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 3:15:59 PM MDT aliak via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 20:15:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 1:04:45 PM MDT aliak via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >> D makes the code-point case default and hence that
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 8:05:04 AM MDT Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-
d wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 20:15:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 1:04:45 PM MDT aliak via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >> D makes the code-point case default and he
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 5:31:43 PM MDT Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 09/05/2018 03:35 PM, Meta wrote:
> > I think the only sane way to use asserts as an
> > optimization guide is when the program will abort if the condition does
> > not hold. That, to me, makes pe
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 8:36:26 PM MDT void via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 01:30:14 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
> > On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 00:20:04 UTC, void wrote:
> >> How do I get a list of all packages (Github URL) available at
> >> code.dlang.org?
> >>
On Friday, September 7, 2018 7:12:30 PM MDT solidstate1991 via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> While for the most part it still works very well, however when
> porting Mago I found a few functions that are not present in C99
> (most notably wcsncpy_s).
>
> While I can write my own functions to do the same
On Sunday, September 9, 2018 11:37:54 AM MDT Laurent Tréguier via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 01:12:30 UTC, solidstate1991
>
> wrote:
> > While for the most part it still works very well, however when
> > porting Mago I found a few functions that are not present in
> >
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 9:36:25 AM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 8/9/18 2:44 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> > On 8/8/2018 2:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> >> Here's where I'm struggling -- because a string provides indexing,
> >> slicing, length, etc. but Phobos i
On Monday, September 10, 2018 2:45:27 AM MDT Chris via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> After a while your code will be cluttered with absurd stuff like
> this. `.byCodeUnit`, `.byGrapheme`, `.array` etc. Due to my
> experience with `splitter` et. al. I tried to create my own
> parser to have better control
On Monday, September 10, 2018 1:44:22 PM MDT H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 12:27:52AM -0600, Jonathan M Davis via
> Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
>
> > IIRC, Weka has different types of assertions to differentiate between
> > these two approache
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 11:06:20 AM MDT Neia Neutuladh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 17:01:33 UTC, Jacob Shtokolov
>
> wrote:
> > So, modification of pointer values is prohibited (if I
> > understand this sentence correctly).
>
> @safe code can't manipulate the
On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 9:59:30 PM MDT Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> So my understanding is that the main issue with extern(C++,"ns") is
> functions that have different C++ name-spaces overriding each other in
> unexpected ways.
> How feasible is to simply disallow functions/variable
On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 3:06:23 PM MDT Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 20:59, Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d
>
> wrote:
> > So my understanding is that the main issue with extern(C++,"ns") is
> > functions that have different C++ name-spaces overriding each other in
>
On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 11:29:42 PM MDT Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 07:06 Manu via Digitalmars-d <
>
> digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 20:59, Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d
> >
> > wrote:
> > > So my understanding is that the mai
On Thursday, September 13, 2018 7:53:49 AM MDT Arafel via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know that many (most?) D users don't like using classes or old,
> manually controlled, concurrency using "shared" & co., but still, since
> they *are* in the language, I think they should at least be usa
On Thursday, September 13, 2018 5:45:56 AM MDT Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 5:14 PM Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d <
>
> digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> > The entire point of having extern(C++, "NS") would be to make it s
On Thursday, September 13, 2018 4:43:47 PM MDT Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 13:01, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
>
> wrote:
> > Walter's concerns seem to center around the idea that we somehow need to
> > model C++ namespaces in D, so that
On Friday, September 14, 2018 12:44:11 PM MDT Neia Neutuladh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 18:13:49 UTC, Eugene Wissner
>
> wrote:
> > Makes the code unreadable. You have to count all attributes in
> > the file, then negate them. Nobody should write like this and
> > t
On Friday, September 14, 2018 10:56:45 AM MDT Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 07:55, 12345swordy via Digitalmars-d
>
> wrote:
> > On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 13:10:07 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> > > On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 09:56:52 UTC, Zot wrote:
> > >> [...]
> >
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 9:31:00 AM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 9/13/18 3:53 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 06:32:54PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2018 09:06 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> >>> The
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 6:54:50 AM MDT Josphe Brigmo via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 12:38:41 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
>
> wrote:
> > On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 10:57:56 UTC, Josphe Brigmo
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Phobos *NEEDS* to be modified to work with these ne
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 5:47:08 PM MDT tide via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 18:33:52 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> > On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 13:54:45 UTC, tide wrote:
> >> On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 19:17:58 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> >>> On Friday, 14 Sep
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 6:28:20 PM MDT Vladimir Panteleev via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 00:14:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > As for figuring out who is "officially" part of the dlang org
> > (or at least has the rights to merge PRs from at least one
>
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 2:07:06 PM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 9/14/18 6:41 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
> > DIP 1015, "Deprecation and removal of implicit conversion from integer
> > and character literals to bool", is now ready for Final Review. This is
> > a last ch
On Saturday, September 15, 2018 7:19:46 PM MDT tide via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 00:53:45 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 15, 2018 6:28:20 PM MDT Vladimir
> >
> > Panteleev via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 00:14:
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 7:28:43 PM MDT Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 09/15/2018 08:14 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > The issue was reported in bugzilla quite some time ago.
> >
> > https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8967
> >
> > However, while Walter's resp
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 6:22:55 PM MDT Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 06:00, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
>
> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 17:46:26 UTC, Steven
> >
> > Schveighoffer wrote:
> > > On 9/14/18 6:41 PM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
> > >> Specific
On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 7:26:07 AM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 9/18/18 9:49 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 6:22:55 PM MDT Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> >> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8667
> >>
> >> O_O
> >>
> >> Thank you
On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 3:16:00 PM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Given dip1008, we now can throw exceptions inside @nogc code! This is
> really cool, and helps make code that uses exceptions or errors @nogc.
> Except...
I pointed out this problem when the DIP was or
On Friday, September 21, 2018 2:33:01 PM MDT new via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> hi,
> is it possible to get a bug fixed x64 compiling D1?
> I don't want to start some rant, but i don't like D2. D1 is
> compact and not so overloaded with funny attributes.
Official support of D1 was dropped nearly 6 yea
On Friday, September 21, 2018 10:54:59 PM MDT Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> I'm torn. I completely agree with Adam and others that people
> should be able to use any language they want. But the Unicode
> spec is such a tire fire that I'm leery of extending support for
> it.
Unicode identifier
On Saturday, September 22, 2018 4:51:47 AM MDT Thomas Mader via Digitalmars-
d wrote:
> On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 10:24:48 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
>
> wrote:
> > Thank Allah that someone said it before I had to. I could not
> > agree more. Encoding whole words as single Unicode code points
> >
On Saturday, September 22, 2018 6:37:09 AM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 9/22/18 4:52 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> I was laughing out loud when reading about composing "family"
> >> emojis with zero-width joiners. If you told me that was a tech
> >> parody, I'd have be
On Saturday, September 22, 2018 10:07:38 AM MDT Neia Neutuladh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 08:52:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Unicode identifiers may make sense in a code base that is going
> > to be used solely by a group of developers who speak a
> > p
On Saturday, September 22, 2018 7:34:55 PM MDT rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 23/09/2018 2:31 AM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
> > On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 13:25:27 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> >> Then D isn't the right choice for you.
> >
> > I think it makes for a better com
On Monday, September 24, 2018 4:19:31 AM MDT Dennis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Monday, 24 September 2018 at 01:32:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> > D the language is well suited to the development of Unicode
> > apps. D source code is another matter.
>
> But in the article you specifically talk a
701 - 800 of 2444 matches
Mail list logo
