Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
If the community is interested, I'd be glad to take over your code and
put it in Phobos.
I'm interested.
Bill Baxter Wrote:
I have no idea why the generated code got bigger again, but it's far
from being the first time.
Check the graph here:
http://www.billbaxter.com/techblog/?p=9
--bb
I thought this bug was a feature... Back to 1.035 then.
digited wrote:
torhu Wrote:
I tried building DWT with -lib when that feature was first added. -lib
seems to be broken somehow, because just compiling one file at a time
results in a much smaller .lib file.
That's normal (really a feature, not a bug) - -lib creates more than one
object
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:28:51 +0200, Bruno Medeiros
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please vote up before the haters take it down, and discuss:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rjk/allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
Andrei
I'm unsure
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
As an example, while I'd enjoy seeing code like this, I'm not sure I'd
enjoy writing it (Note that I am prone to exaggerations):
int a = ∅; //empty set, same as = void
int[] b = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
a = readInt();
Hum, interesting example, it
Jesse Phillips, el 23 de octubre a las 02:04 me escribiste:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:44:56 +0200, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:42:05 +0200, Sean Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don wrote:
'std', 'stdc' and 'sys' sound OK to me. Although is there any reason
why stdc
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Gromov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:43:19 +0900,
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
(like I haven't been able to figure out how to get the
DOS console in Windows
